handle precompiled compiler more properly

[onur-ozkan]

Fixes the build cycle problem reported on #t-infra/bootstrap > Cycle on `aarch64-apple`.

[rustbot]

r? @albertlarsan68

rustbot has assigned @albertlarsan68.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

[onur-ozkan]

@bors p=100

[jieyouxu]

Thanks for the quick fix, the logic here looks correct to me AFAICT.

@bors r+ rollup=never

[bors]

📌 Commit dd8d1b4 has been approved by jieyouxu

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit dd8d1b4 with merge cdd8af2...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: jieyouxu
Pushing cdd8af2 to master...

[rust-log-analyzer]

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

gh pr comment ${HEAD_PR} -F output.log
shell: /usr/bin/bash -e {0}
##[endgroup]
fatal: ambiguous argument 'HEAD^1': unknown revision or path not in the working tree.
Use '--' to separate paths from revisions, like this:
'git <command> [<revision>...] -- [<file>...]'
##[error]Process completed with exit code 128.

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (cdd8af2): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -2.8%, secondary 2.9%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.9%	[2.9%, 2.9%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-2.8%	[-2.8%, -2.8%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-2.8%	[-2.8%, -2.8%]	1

Cycles

Results (primary 1.7%, secondary 1.8%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	1.7%	[1.2%, 2.1%]	2
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	1.8%	[1.8%, 1.8%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	1.7%	[1.2%, 2.1%]	2

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 766.756s -> 766.8s (0.01%)
Artifact size: 362.11 MiB -> 362.14 MiB (0.01%)