Improve suggest construct with literal syntax instead of calling #139014
+157
−34
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
Please make your ui test commit pass on its own so the second commit shows the difference. That makes it a bit easier to review |
Signed-off-by: xizheyin <xizheyin@smail.nju.edu.cn>
|
Ok, I submitted the test in the first commit and got it to pass on the original version of the code. In the second commit I modified the code and submitted the changes to the ui test output. |
oli-obk
reviewed
Mar 27, 2025
Signed-off-by: xizheyin <xizheyin@smail.nju.edu.cn>
|
@bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 27, 2025
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#138844 (expand: Leave traces when expanding `cfg` attributes) - rust-lang#138926 (Remove `kw::Empty` uses from `rustc_middle`.) - rust-lang#138989 (Clean up a few things in rustc_hir_analysis::check::region) - rust-lang#138999 (Report compiletest pass mode if forced) - rust-lang#139014 (Improve suggest construct with literal syntax instead of calling) - rust-lang#139015 (Remove unneeded LLVM CI test assertions) - rust-lang#139016 (Add job duration changes to post-merge analysis report) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 27, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#139014 - xizheyin:issue-138931, r=oli-obk Improve suggest construct with literal syntax instead of calling Closing rust-lang#138931 When constructing a structure through a format similar to calling a constructor, we can use verbose suggestions to hint at using literal syntax for clearer advice. The case of multiple fields is also considered here, provided that the field has the same number of arguments as CallExpr. r? compiler
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #138931
When constructing a structure through a format similar to calling a constructor, we can use verbose suggestions to hint at using literal syntax for clearer advice. The case of multiple fields is also considered here, provided that the field has the same number of arguments as CallExpr.
r? compiler