Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove attribute #[rustc_error] #139122

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 31, 2025
Merged

Remove attribute #[rustc_error] #139122

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 31, 2025

Conversation

petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

It was an ancient way to write check-pass tests, but now it's no longer necessary (except for the delayed_bug_from_inside_query flavor, which is retained).

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 29, 2025

r? @oli-obk

rustbot has assigned @oli-obk.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Mar 29, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 29, 2025

rust-analyzer is developed in its own repository. If possible, consider making this change to rust-lang/rust-analyzer instead.

cc @rust-lang/rust-analyzer

Copy link
Member

@compiler-errors compiler-errors left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, but one question for the r-a folks

@@ -665,10 +665,6 @@ pub const INERT_ATTRIBUTES: &[BuiltinAttribute] = &[
rustc_attr!(TEST, rustc_layout, Normal, template!(List: "field1, field2, ..."), WarnFollowing),
rustc_attr!(TEST, rustc_abi, Normal, template!(List: "field1, field2, ..."), WarnFollowing),
rustc_attr!(TEST, rustc_regions, Normal, template!(Word), WarnFollowing),
rustc_attr!(
Copy link
Member

@compiler-errors compiler-errors Mar 30, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Doesn't the rust-analyzer team deal with these attrs themselves? I don't think we typically tweak this lint ourselves from within the rust-lang/rust repo when modifying internal attrs.

Maybe someone like @Veykril would know?

Copy link
Member

@lnicola lnicola Mar 30, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's fine. We auto-generate some files, but not that one IIUC. The concern behind that rustbot check is to avoid conflicts on subtree syncs, but it's not a problem in this case and almost nobody follows up with a r-a PR anyway.

It's fine to leave it out too, since it shouldn't harm.

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

r=me after confirming w/ them

r? compiler-errors

@rustbot rustbot assigned compiler-errors and unassigned oli-obk Mar 30, 2025
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Mar 30, 2025

@bors r=compiler-errors

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 30, 2025

📌 Commit 2dfd2a2 has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 30, 2025
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Mar 30, 2025

@bors rollup

jhpratt added a commit to jhpratt/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 30, 2025
…rors

Remove attribute `#[rustc_error]`

It was an ancient way to write `check-pass` tests, but now it's no longer necessary (except for the `delayed_bug_from_inside_query` flavor, which is retained).
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 30, 2025
Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#139044 (bootstrap: Avoid cloning `change-id` list)
 - rust-lang#139111 (Properly document FakeReads)
 - rust-lang#139113 (unstable book: in a sanitizer example, check the code)
 - rust-lang#139122 (Remove attribute `#[rustc_error]`)
 - rust-lang#139132 (Improve hir_pretty for struct expressions.)
 - rust-lang#139141 (Switch some rustc_on_unimplemented uses to diagnostic::on_unimplemented)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2025
Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#139044 (bootstrap: Avoid cloning `change-id` list)
 - rust-lang#139111 (Properly document FakeReads)
 - rust-lang#139122 (Remove attribute `#[rustc_error]`)
 - rust-lang#139132 (Improve hir_pretty for struct expressions.)
 - rust-lang#139141 (Switch some rustc_on_unimplemented uses to diagnostic::on_unimplemented)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit eb42422 into rust-lang:master Mar 31, 2025
6 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.88.0 milestone Mar 31, 2025
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#139122 - petrochenkov:norerr, r=compiler-errors

Remove attribute `#[rustc_error]`

It was an ancient way to write `check-pass` tests, but now it's no longer necessary (except for the `delayed_bug_from_inside_query` flavor, which is retained).
github-actions bot pushed a commit to model-checking/verify-rust-std that referenced this pull request Apr 2, 2025
Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#139044 (bootstrap: Avoid cloning `change-id` list)
 - rust-lang#139111 (Properly document FakeReads)
 - rust-lang#139122 (Remove attribute `#[rustc_error]`)
 - rust-lang#139132 (Improve hir_pretty for struct expressions.)
 - rust-lang#139141 (Switch some rustc_on_unimplemented uses to diagnostic::on_unimplemented)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants