Skip to content

Don't build ParamEnv and do trait solving in ItemCtxts when lowering IATs #140247

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

BoxyUwU
Copy link
Member

@BoxyUwU BoxyUwU commented Apr 24, 2025

Fixes #108491

Fixes #125879
This was due to updating inhabited predicate stuff which I had to do to make constructing ADTs with IATs in fields not ICE

Fixes #136678 (but no test added, I don't rly care about weird IAT edge cases under GCE)

Fixes #138240
Fixes #138266
These ICEs got masked but we have 3 other ICEs that look like dupes so I'm not too worried about this. Caused by mgca not properly lowering paths in type signatures to forbid infers or something, and now we happen to emit an error when we previously didnt.

Avoids doing "fully correct" candidate selection for IATs during hir ty lowering when in item signatures as it almost always leads to a query cycle from trying to build a ParamEnv. I replaced it with a use DeepRejectCtxt which should be able to handle this kind of conservative "could these types unify" while in a context where we don't want to do type equality.

A potential alternative would be to replace all the generic parameters in the self type with inference variables as then it would be "truly" environment agnostic and we could just use an empty environment. I think this is somewhat subpar as we would be weakening how much we used the self type to guide candidate selection and that's the only way for the user to attempt to specify which IAT to resolve to.

In general that's also why I think doing something hacky here instead of just throwing our hands up and saying "ItemCtxts shouldnt make inference variables" and not filtering any candidates out, is a good idea (there is no way for users to disambiguate such cases).

I'm not really sure how this interacts with #126651, though I'm also not really sure its super important to support projecting IATs from IAT self types given we don't even support T::Assoc::Other for trait-associated types so didn't give much thought to how this might fit in with that.

r? @compiler-errors
cc @fmease

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 24, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 24, 2025

This PR changes a file inside tests/crashes. If a crash was fixed, please move into the corresponding ui subdir and add 'Fixes #' to the PR description to autoclose the issue upon merge.

HIR ty lowering was modified

cc @fmease

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 28, 2025

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #140388) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 22, 2025

📌 Commit 34ce403 has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 22, 2025
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 22, 2025
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#135562 (Add ignore value suggestion in closure body)
 - rust-lang#139635 (Finalize repeat expr inference behaviour with inferred repeat counts)
 - rust-lang#139668 (Handle regions equivalent to 'static in non_local_bounds)
 - rust-lang#140218 (HIR ty lowering: Clean up & refactor the lowering of type-relative paths)
 - rust-lang#140435 (use uX::from instead of _ as uX in non - const contexts)
 - rust-lang#141130 (rustc_on_unimplemented cleanups)
 - rust-lang#141286 (Querify `coroutine_hidden_types`)

Failed merges:

 - rust-lang#140247 (Don't build `ParamEnv` and do trait solving in `ItemCtxt`s when lowering IATs)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 23, 2025

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #141396) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels May 23, 2025
@BoxyUwU BoxyUwU force-pushed the iats_no_query_cycles branch 2 times, most recently from aee1a22 to 701d3b8 Compare May 23, 2025 14:25
@BoxyUwU
Copy link
Member Author

BoxyUwU commented May 23, 2025

I should probably update this to use DeepRejectCtxt and handle LTAs correctly like discussed at the all hands 🤔 I was just gonna do it in a followup PR but if I'm having to rebase and figure out new crashes tests then I may aswell just do it all now

@BoxyUwU BoxyUwU force-pushed the iats_no_query_cycles branch from 701d3b8 to 276daf2 Compare May 23, 2025 15:16
@BoxyUwU BoxyUwU force-pushed the iats_no_query_cycles branch from 276daf2 to 5867bb5 Compare May 23, 2025 16:22
// We make an infcx and replace any escaping vars with placeholders so that IAT res
// with type/const bound vars in arguments is slightly smarter. `for<T> <Foo<T>>::IAT`
// would otherwise unify with `impl Foo<u8>` when ideally we would not.
let infcx = self.tcx().infer_ctxt().build(TypingMode::non_body_analysis());
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Creating an infcx just to make placeholders feels pretty bad lol

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@BoxyUwU BoxyUwU force-pushed the iats_no_query_cycles branch from 5867bb5 to 02b87a8 Compare May 23, 2025 18:06
Comment on lines -1448 to -1450
if candidates.is_empty() {
return Ok(None);
}
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Removing this masked a bunch of mgca ICEs I think. We now emit errors in all cases where IAT resolution fails to find any candidates which makes some delayed bugs no longer trigger. I've replaced a few of the crashes tests with examples that don't rely on IATs and I removed the two others that I couldn't find a reproducer for that didn't seem like a dupe of the other three.

@BoxyUwU BoxyUwU force-pushed the iats_no_query_cycles branch from 02b87a8 to ccec360 Compare May 23, 2025 19:16
@BoxyUwU BoxyUwU added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels May 23, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
6 participants