Skip to content

[perf] Cache evaluations even when proof tree is being built #142643

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

🤷

@rustbot rustbot added T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver) labels Jun 17, 2025
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member Author

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Jun 17, 2025
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member Author

@bors2 try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-bors
Copy link

rust-bors bot commented Jun 17, 2025

⌛ Trying commit 93ff544 with merge 230b39e

To cancel the try build, run the command @bors2 try cancel.

rust-bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2025
[perf] Cache evaluations even when proof tree is being built

🤷
@rust-bors
Copy link

rust-bors bot commented Jun 18, 2025

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: 230b39e (230b39e36309cc4edb16143802d28ca3dd0e2fe7, parent: f3db63916e541ff039ac3cd7364c2d612749b61b)

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (230b39e): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request means it may be perf-sensitive – we'll automatically label it not fit for rolling up. You can override this, but we strongly advise not to, due to possible changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.2% [0.2%, 0.2%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 10.2%, secondary -1.6%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
10.2% [10.2%, 10.2%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
3.2% [3.2%, 3.2%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-3.2% [-5.8%, -1.4%] 3
All ❌✅ (primary) 10.2% [10.2%, 10.2%] 1

Cycles

Results (primary -1.8%, secondary -2.7%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-1.8% [-1.8%, -1.8%] 2
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.7% [-3.6%, -1.6%] 9
All ❌✅ (primary) -1.8% [-1.8%, -1.8%] 2

Binary size

Results (secondary 0.0%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.0% [0.0%, 0.0%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Bootstrap: 692.654s -> 693.372s (0.10%)
Artifact size: 372.15 MiB -> 372.15 MiB (-0.00%)

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Jun 18, 2025
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member Author

ok useless

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants