Skip to content

Improve diagnostics for concat_bytes! with C string literals #142698

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 21, 2025

Conversation

tgross35
Copy link
Contributor

Use the same error as other invalid types for concat_bytes!, rather
than using ConcatCStrLit from concat!. Also add more information
with a note about why this doesn't work, and a suggestion to use a
null-terminated byte string instead.

Also ensure the suggestions are checked, since this will be updated.
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 19, 2025

r? @petrochenkov

rustbot has assigned @petrochenkov.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jun 19, 2025
@petrochenkov petrochenkov added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 19, 2025
Use the same error as other invalid types for `concat_bytes!`, rather
than using `ConcatCStrLit` from `concat!`. Also add more information
with a note about why this doesn't work, and a suggestion to use a
null-terminated byte string instead.
@tgross35 tgross35 force-pushed the concat-byte-cstr-diag branch from 7c61bb0 to 044c99d Compare June 19, 2025 16:14
@tgross35
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rustbot ready

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Jun 19, 2025
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 19, 2025

📌 Commit 044c99d has been approved by petrochenkov

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 19, 2025
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 21, 2025
Rollup of 3 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #142539 (Port `#[may_dangle]` to the new attribute system)
 - #142690 (expand: Remove some unnecessary generic parameters)
 - #142698 (Improve diagnostics for `concat_bytes!` with C string  literals)

Failed merges:

 - #142600 (Port `#[rustc_pub_transparent]` to the new attribute system)
 - #142776 (All HIR attributes are outer)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit c693bc2 into rust-lang:master Jun 21, 2025
10 checks passed
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 21, 2025
Rollup merge of #142698 - tgross35:concat-byte-cstr-diag, r=petrochenkov

Improve diagnostics for `concat_bytes!` with C string  literals

Use the same error as other invalid types for `concat_bytes!`, rather
than using `ConcatCStrLit` from `concat!`. Also add more information
with a note about why this doesn't work, and a suggestion to use a
null-terminated byte string instead.
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.89.0 milestone Jun 21, 2025
@tgross35 tgross35 deleted the concat-byte-cstr-diag branch June 21, 2025 23:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants