De-dup common code from ExternalCrate methods
#142720
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
r? @notriddle rustbot has assigned @notriddle. Use |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
yotamofek
commented
Jun 19, 2025
yotamofek
force-pushed
the
pr/rustdoc/ext-crate-cleanup
branch
from
05b2698 to
203bbe1
Compare
|
@bors2 try @rust-timer queue |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
rust-bors bot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 19, 2025
De-dup common code from `ExternalCrate` methods
<!-- homu-ignore:start -->
<!--
If this PR is related to an unstable feature or an otherwise tracked effort,
please link to the relevant tracking issue here. If you don't know of a related
tracking issue or there are none, feel free to ignore this.
This PR will get automatically assigned to a reviewer. In case you would like
a specific user to review your work, you can assign it to them by using
r? <reviewer name>
-->
<!-- homu-ignore:end -->
Also, return an `impl Iterator` instead of collecting into a `Vec`. Not sure if that'll have a measurable perf impact, but I think this PR still cleans up the two methods it touches quite nicely.
(I'm having trouble finding a name for the common method I extracted, currently called `foobar`, would love suggestions!)
rustbot
added
the
S-waiting-on-perf
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
yotamofek
force-pushed
the
pr/rustdoc/ext-crate-cleanup
branch
from
203bbe1 to
aca0688
Compare
|
@bors2 try cancel |
|
Try build cancelled. Cancelled workflows: |
|
@bors2 try @rust-timer queue |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
rust-bors bot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 19, 2025
De-dup common code from `ExternalCrate` methods
<!-- homu-ignore:start -->
<!--
If this PR is related to an unstable feature or an otherwise tracked effort,
please link to the relevant tracking issue here. If you don't know of a related
tracking issue or there are none, feel free to ignore this.
This PR will get automatically assigned to a reviewer. In case you would like
a specific user to review your work, you can assign it to them by using
r? <reviewer name>
-->
<!-- homu-ignore:end -->
Also, return an `impl Iterator` instead of collecting into a `Vec`. Not sure if that'll have a measurable perf impact, but I think this PR still cleans up the two methods it touches quite nicely.
(I'm having trouble finding a name for the common method I extracted, currently called `foobar`, would love suggestions!)
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Finished benchmarking commit (4328207): comparison URL. Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action neededBenchmarking this pull request means it may be perf-sensitive – we'll automatically label it not fit for rolling up. You can override this, but we strongly advise not to, due to possible changes in compiler perf. @bors rollup=never Instruction countOur most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.
Max RSS (memory usage)Results (primary -2.0%, secondary -4.6%)A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.
CyclesResults (secondary 5.1%)A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.
Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 692.244s -> 691.619s (-0.09%) |
rustbot
removed
the
S-waiting-on-perf
|
Secondary improvement is spurious (it's for the opt profile), so perf is neutral, unsurprisingly. |
GuillaumeGomez
approved these changes
Jun 20, 2025
|
So all good, thanks! @bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Kobzol
added a commit
to Kobzol/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 20, 2025
…anup, r=GuillaumeGomez De-dup common code from `ExternalCrate` methods Also, return an `impl Iterator` instead of collecting into a `Vec`. Not sure if that'll have a measurable perf impact, but I think this PR still cleans up the two methods it touches quite nicely. (I'm having trouble finding a name for the common method I extracted, currently called `foobar`, would love suggestions!)
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 20, 2025
Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - #142478 (install docs for each target in different directory) - #142629 (Add config builder for bootstrap tests) - #142715 (correct template for `#[align]` attribute) - #142720 (De-dup common code from `ExternalCrate` methods) - #142736 (add issue template for rustdoc) - #142743 (rustc-dev-guide subtree update) - #142744 (Add a mailmap entry for y21) - #142758 (Make sure to rebuild rustdoc if `src/rustdoc-json-types` is changed) - #142764 (Convert `ilog(10)` to `ilog10()`) - #142767 (Some symbol and PathRoot cleanups) - #142769 (remove equivalent new method on context) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 20, 2025
Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - #142629 (Add config builder for bootstrap tests) - #142715 (correct template for `#[align]` attribute) - #142720 (De-dup common code from `ExternalCrate` methods) - #142736 (add issue template for rustdoc) - #142743 (rustc-dev-guide subtree update) - #142744 (Add a mailmap entry for y21) - #142758 (Make sure to rebuild rustdoc if `src/rustdoc-json-types` is changed) - #142764 (Convert `ilog(10)` to `ilog10()`) - #142767 (Some symbol and PathRoot cleanups) - #142769 (remove equivalent new method on context) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 20, 2025
Rollup merge of #142720 - yotamofek:pr/rustdoc/ext-crate-cleanup, r=GuillaumeGomez De-dup common code from `ExternalCrate` methods Also, return an `impl Iterator` instead of collecting into a `Vec`. Not sure if that'll have a measurable perf impact, but I think this PR still cleans up the two methods it touches quite nicely. (I'm having trouble finding a name for the common method I extracted, currently called `foobar`, would love suggestions!)
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 23, 2025
Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang/rust#142629 (Add config builder for bootstrap tests) - rust-lang/rust#142715 (correct template for `#[align]` attribute) - rust-lang/rust#142720 (De-dup common code from `ExternalCrate` methods) - rust-lang/rust#142736 (add issue template for rustdoc) - rust-lang/rust#142743 (rustc-dev-guide subtree update) - rust-lang/rust#142744 (Add a mailmap entry for y21) - rust-lang/rust#142758 (Make sure to rebuild rustdoc if `src/rustdoc-json-types` is changed) - rust-lang/rust#142764 (Convert `ilog(10)` to `ilog10()`) - rust-lang/rust#142767 (Some symbol and PathRoot cleanups) - rust-lang/rust#142769 (remove equivalent new method on context) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Also, return an
impl Iteratorinstead of collecting into aVec. Not sure if that'll have a measurable perf impact, but I think this PR still cleans up the two methods it touches quite nicely.(I'm having trouble finding a name for the common method I extracted, currently called
foobar, would love suggestions!)