use is_multiple_of and div_ceil
#143477
Merged
use is_multiple_of and div_ceil
#143477
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
A-LLVM
|
Portable SIMD is developed in its own repository. If possible, consider making this change to rust-lang/portable-simd instead. cc @calebzulawski, @programmerjake Some changes occurred to the CTFE machinery Some changes occurred to the CTFE / Miri interpreter cc @rust-lang/miri |
hanna-kruppe
reviewed
Jul 5, 2025
folkertdev
force-pushed
the
use-is-multiple-of
branch
from
0649318 to
ed3711e
Compare
|
@bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 6, 2025
Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - #143416 (mbe: Defer checks for `compile_error!` until reporting an unused macro rule) - #143470 (std: sys: net: uefi: tcp4: Implement read) - #143477 (use `is_multiple_of` and `div_ceil`) - #143484 (distinguish the duplicate item of rpitit) - #143493 (tidy: use --bless for tidy spellcheck instead of spellcheck:fix) - #143504 (compiletest: print slightly more information on fs::write failure) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 6, 2025
Rollup merge of #143477 - folkertdev:use-is-multiple-of, r=joshtriplett use `is_multiple_of` and `div_ceil` In tricky logic, these functions are much more informative than the manual implementations. They also catch subtle bugs: - the manual `is_multiple_of` often does not handle division by zero - manual `div_ceil` often does not consider overflow The transformation is free for `is_multiple_of` if the divisor is compile-time known to be non-zero. For `div_ceil` there is a small cost to considering overflow. Here is some assembly https://godbolt.org/z/5zP8KaE1d.
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to model-checking/verify-rust-std
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 11, 2025
…oshtriplett use `is_multiple_of` and `div_ceil` In tricky logic, these functions are much more informative than the manual implementations. They also catch subtle bugs: - the manual `is_multiple_of` often does not handle division by zero - manual `div_ceil` often does not consider overflow The transformation is free for `is_multiple_of` if the divisor is compile-time known to be non-zero. For `div_ceil` there is a small cost to considering overflow. Here is some assembly https://godbolt.org/z/5zP8KaE1d.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In tricky logic, these functions are much more informative than the manual implementations. They also catch subtle bugs:
is_multiple_ofoften does not handle division by zerodiv_ceiloften does not consider overflowThe transformation is free for
is_multiple_ofif the divisor is compile-time known to be non-zero. Fordiv_ceilthere is a small cost to considering overflow. Here is some assembly https://godbolt.org/z/5zP8KaE1d.