Propagate from borrowed locals in CopyProp

[tmiasko]

r? cjgillot

[rustbot]

Some changes occurred to MIR optimizations

cc @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt

[tmiasko]

@bors2 try @rust-timer queue

[rust-bors]

⌛ Trying commit dd34b79 with merge 1e4b0b7…

To cancel the try build, run the command @bors2 try cancel.

[rust-bors]

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: 1e4b0b7 (1e4b0b7e6afa40bec58198f6cdb7d7bbfdf3efd0, parent: 688ea65df6a47866d0f72a00f1e18b47a7edf83b)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (1e4b0b7): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request means it may be perf-sensitive – we'll automatically label it not fit for rolling up. You can override this, but we strongly advise not to, due to possible changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.4%	[0.4%, 0.4%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.2%	[-0.3%, -0.1%]	18
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.3%	[-0.6%, -0.0%]	26
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.1%	[-0.3%, 0.4%]	19

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 1.9%, secondary 2.2%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	5.5%	[5.5%, 5.5%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.2%	[2.2%, 2.2%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.7%	[-1.7%, -1.7%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	1.9%	[-1.7%, 5.5%]	2

Cycles

Results (primary 2.4%, secondary -3.9%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	2.4%	[2.4%, 2.4%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-3.9%	[-5.7%, -2.8%]	3
All ❌✅ (primary)	2.4%	[2.4%, 2.4%]	1

Binary size

Results (primary 0.1%, secondary -0.1%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.3%	[0.0%, 1.3%]	11
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.1%	[0.0%, 0.3%]	6
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.1%	[-0.4%, -0.0%]	20
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.3%	[-0.6%, -0.0%]	8
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.1%	[-0.4%, 1.3%]	31

Bootstrap: 465.817s -> 464.2s (-0.35%)
Artifact size: 372.34 MiB -> 372.35 MiB (0.00%)

[cjgillot]

Thanks!
@bors r+

[bors]

📌 Commit 9681786 has been approved by cjgillot

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 9681786 with merge bfc046a...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: cjgillot
Pushing bfc046a to master...

[github-actions]

What is this?

This is an experimental post-merge analysis report that shows differences in test outcomes between the merged PR and its parent PR.

Comparing 915e535 (parent) -> bfc046a (this PR)

Test differences

Show 3 test diffs

3 doctest diffs were found. These are ignored, as they are noisy.

Test dashboard

Run

cargo run --manifest-path src/ci/citool/Cargo.toml -- \
    test-dashboard bfc046a4b8d6b57db02540182466e989a9b0fb40 --output-dir test-dashboard

And then open test-dashboard/index.html in your browser to see an overview of all executed tests.

Job duration changes

1. tidy: 100.7s -> 75.8s (-24.7%)
2. aarch64-apple: 4978.9s -> 3776.1s (-24.2%)
3. x86_64-apple-2: 3910.5s -> 3030.3s (-22.5%)
4. x86_64-apple-1: 7098.6s -> 5811.1s (-18.1%)
5. pr-check-2: 2633.7s -> 2175.1s (-17.4%)
6. x86_64-rust-for-linux: 2955.6s -> 2540.8s (-14.0%)
7. pr-check-1: 1748.8s -> 1513.1s (-13.5%)
8. i686-gnu-2: 6195.5s -> 5393.6s (-12.9%)
9. dist-x86_64-apple: 7334.0s -> 8209.6s (11.9%)
10. arm-android: 6629.4s -> 5871.1s (-11.4%)

How to interpret the job duration changes?

Job durations can vary a lot, based on the actual runner instance
that executed the job, system noise, invalidated caches, etc. The table above is provided
mostly for t-infra members, for simpler debugging of potential CI slow-downs.

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (bfc046a): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.5%	[0.5%, 0.5%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.0%	[0.0%, 0.0%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.2%	[-0.6%, -0.1%]	27
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.3%	[-1.0%, -0.0%]	33
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.1%	[-0.6%, 0.5%]	28

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 1.8%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	6.2%	[6.2%, 6.2%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-2.6%	[-2.6%, -2.6%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	1.8%	[-2.6%, 6.2%]	2

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

Results (primary 0.1%, secondary -0.1%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.2%	[0.0%, 0.9%]	13
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.1%	[0.0%, 0.3%]	4
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.1%	[-0.4%, -0.0%]	15
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.3%	[-0.6%, -0.0%]	9
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.1%	[-0.4%, 0.9%]	28

Bootstrap: 466.126s -> 464.174s (-0.42%)
Artifact size: 374.63 MiB -> 374.70 MiB (0.02%)