Skip to content

Conversation

weihanglo
Copy link
Member

TODO: stabilization report?

r? rustdoc

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Sep 5, 2025
@weihanglo
Copy link
Member Author

Questions:

  • Do we want to stabilize also unversioned-shared-resources option? It currently does nothing AFAIK.
  • Do we want a stabilization report?
  • How many details do we want to put in doc?

@weihanglo
Copy link
Member Author

cc @aDotInTheVoid since you've involved in the PR removing the last blocker :)

@weihanglo weihanglo marked this pull request as ready for review September 24, 2025 19:21
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Sep 24, 2025
@fmease fmease added the needs-fcp This change is insta-stable, or significant enough to need a team FCP to proceed. label Oct 13, 2025
Comment on lines +459 to +461
filename is `CRATE_NAME.d`. This emit type can can optionally be followed by
`=` to specify an explicit output path.
For example, `--emit=dep-info=/path/to/foo.d`.
Copy link
Member

@fmease fmease Oct 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Found a bug: rustdoc's --emit=dep-info=- doesn't output to STDOUT unlike rustc's.

Edit: This ought to be addressed in a separate PR by someone. I'll probably open an issue later to track this.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Opened #147649 (blocking the stabilization IMO).

@notriddle notriddle self-assigned this Oct 13, 2025
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

We discussed on today's rustdoc meeting. Before going any further, we will investigate exactly what each --emit option does exactly to have a clearer picture of what's actually needed and also to add missing documentation.

@weihanglo
Copy link
Member Author

We discussed on today's rustdoc meeting. Before going any further, we will investigate exactly what each --emit option does exactly to have a clearer picture of what's actually needed and also to add missing documentation.

Thanks for it!

This PR contains a doc based on my understanding and the history of these options, but I am not 100% sure if that is correct

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

needs-fcp This change is insta-stable, or significant enough to need a team FCP to proceed. S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants