Fix broken STD build for ESP-IDF #147213
Merged
Fix broken STD build for ESP-IDF #147213
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
CC @joboet |
|
@bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 1, 2025
Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - #146918 (add regression test) - #146980 (simplify setup_constraining_predicates, and note it is potentially cubic) - #147170 (compiletest: Pass around `DirectiveLine` instead of bare strings) - #147180 (add tests) - #147188 (Remove usage of `compiletest-use-stage0-libtest` from CI) - #147189 (Replace `rustc_span::Span` with a stripped down version for librustdoc's highlighter) - #147199 (remove outdated comment in (inner) `InferCtxt`) - #147200 (Fix autodiff empty ret regression) - #147209 (Remove `no-remap-src-base` from tests) - #147213 (Fix broken STD build for ESP-IDF) - #147217 (Don't create a top-level `true` directory when running UI tests) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 1, 2025
Rollup merge of #147213 - ivmarkov:fix-hostname-espidf, r=joboet Fix broken STD build for ESP-IDF PRs #147162 and #146937 did [broke](https://github.com/esp-rs/esp-idf-sys/actions/runs/18151791720/job/51663969786) the STD build for `target_os = "espidf"` because that target [does not have neither a `gethostname`, not a `libc::_SC_HOST_NAME_MAX` by default](espressif/esp-idf#14849). While there is a [3rd party component for this syscall](https://components.espressif.com/components/espressif/sock_utils/versions/0.2.2/readme) in the ESP-IDF component registry, I don't think we should use it, because it does not come with ESP-IDF by default. Therefore, the one-liner fix just re-routes ESP-IDF into the `unsupported` branch.
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to model-checking/verify-rust-std
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 9, 2025
…boet Fix broken STD build for ESP-IDF PRs rust-lang#147162 and rust-lang#146937 did [broke](https://github.com/esp-rs/esp-idf-sys/actions/runs/18151791720/job/51663969786) the STD build for `target_os = "espidf"` because that target [does not have neither a `gethostname`, not a `libc::_SC_HOST_NAME_MAX` by default](espressif/esp-idf#14849). While there is a [3rd party component for this syscall](https://components.espressif.com/components/espressif/sock_utils/versions/0.2.2/readme) in the ESP-IDF component registry, I don't think we should use it, because it does not come with ESP-IDF by default. Therefore, the one-liner fix just re-routes ESP-IDF into the `unsupported` branch.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PRs #147162 and #146937 did broke the STD build for
target_os = "espidf"because that target does not have neither agethostname, not alibc::_SC_HOST_NAME_MAXby default.While there is a 3rd party component for this syscall in the ESP-IDF component registry, I don't think we should use it, because it does not come with ESP-IDF by default.
Therefore, the one-liner fix just re-routes ESP-IDF into the
unsupportedbranch.