Fix double warnings on #[no_mangle]
#147467
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
This PR modifies Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_attr_parsing |
rustbot
added
A-attributes
jdonszelmann
reviewed
Oct 8, 2025
|
r=me after comments are addressed @bors delegate+ |
|
✌️ @JonathanBrouwer, you can now approve this pull request! If @jdonszelmann told you to " |
JonathanBrouwer
force-pushed
the
double_warnings
branch
from
7d484f0 to
cdc0e5f
Compare
|
@bors r=@jdonszelmann rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added
S-waiting-on-author
JonathanBrouwer
force-pushed
the
double_warnings
branch
from
cdc0e5f to
c050bfb
Compare
|
This PR was rebased onto a different master commit. Here's a range-diff highlighting what actually changed. Rebasing is a normal part of keeping PRs up to date, so no action is needed—this note is just to help reviewers. |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 8, 2025
…=JonathanBrouwer Fix double warnings on `#[no_mangle]` Fixes 2 out of 3 cases in rust-lang#147417 The fix on closures removes the old error and marks closures as an error target. The fix on consts adds `AllowSilent` to to ignore a target, and uses the old error because that one has a nice suggestion. r? `@jdonszelmann`
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 8, 2025
…=JonathanBrouwer Fix double warnings on `#[no_mangle]` Fixes 2 out of 3 cases in rust-lang#147417 The fix on closures removes the old error and marks closures as an error target. The fix on consts adds `AllowSilent` to to ignore a target, and uses the old error because that one has a nice suggestion. r? ``@jdonszelmann``
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 8, 2025
Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - #143900 ([rustdoc] Correctly handle `should_panic` doctest attribute and fix `--no-run` test flag on the 2024 edition) - #147420 (Add diagnostic items for `pub mod consts` of FP types) - #147467 (Fix double warnings on `#[no_mangle]`) - #147476 (Add a test for the cold attribute) - #147480 (Do not invalidate CFG caches in CtfeLimit.) - #147481 (format: some small cleanup) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
chenyukang
added a commit
to chenyukang/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 9, 2025
…=JonathanBrouwer Fix double warnings on `#[no_mangle]` Fixes 2 out of 3 cases in rust-lang#147417 The fix on closures removes the old error and marks closures as an error target. The fix on consts adds `AllowSilent` to to ignore a target, and uses the old error because that one has a nice suggestion. r? ```@jdonszelmann```
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 9, 2025
Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - #143900 ([rustdoc] Correctly handle `should_panic` doctest attribute and fix `--no-run` test flag on the 2024 edition) - #147420 (Add diagnostic items for `pub mod consts` of FP types) - #147467 (Fix double warnings on `#[no_mangle]`) - #147470 (Clarify how to remediate the panic_immediate_abort error) - #147480 (Do not invalidate CFG caches in CtfeLimit.) - #147481 (format: some small cleanup) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 9, 2025
Rollup of 12 pull requests Successful merges: - #146568 (Port the implemention of SIMD intrinsics from Miri to const-eval) - #147373 (give a better example why `std` modules named like primitives are needed) - #147419 (bootstrap: add `Builder::rustc_cmd` that includes the lib path) - #147420 (Add diagnostic items for `pub mod consts` of FP types) - #147457 (specialize slice::fill to use memset when possible) - #147467 (Fix double warnings on `#[no_mangle]`) - #147470 (Clarify how to remediate the panic_immediate_abort error) - #147480 (Do not invalidate CFG caches in CtfeLimit.) - #147481 (format: some small cleanup) - #147488 (refactor: Remove `LLVMRustInsertPrivateGlobal` and `define_private_global`) - #147489 (Prefer to use repeat_n over repeat().take()) - #147506 (compiletest: Isolate public APIs and minimize public surface area) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 9, 2025
Rollup merge of #147467 - JonathanBrouwer:double_warnings, r=JonathanBrouwer Fix double warnings on `#[no_mangle]` Fixes 2 out of 3 cases in #147417 The fix on closures removes the old error and marks closures as an error target. The fix on consts adds `AllowSilent` to to ignore a target, and uses the old error because that one has a nice suggestion. r? ````@jdonszelmann````
wesleywiser
added
the
beta-nominated
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes 2 out of 3 cases in #147417
The fix on closures removes the old error and marks closures as an error target.
The fix on consts adds
AllowSilentto to ignore a target, and uses the old error because that one has a nice suggestion.r? @jdonszelmann