rustdoc-search: stringdex 0.0.2 #147660

notriddle · 2025-10-14T04:25:12Z

Two index format tweaks that reduce the size of the standard library, compiler, and wordnet dictionary when I test it.

CC #146048

FF Profiler output: https://share.firefox.dev/4onH5xP

Preview: https://notriddle.com/rustdoc-html-demo-12/stringdex-002/std/index.html

Two index format tweaks that reduce the size of the standard library, compiler, and wordnet dictionary when I test it.

notriddle · 2025-10-14T05:24:25Z

@bors try @rust-timer queue

rustdoc-search: stringdex 0.0.2

rust-bors · 2025-10-14T07:37:33Z

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: 7174e3d (7174e3dd4a5b953adb06a575b83ac36bd1dbd7e3, parent: 4b94758d2ba7d0ef71ccf5fde29ce4bc5d6fe2a4)

rust-timer · 2025-10-14T08:47:03Z

Finished benchmarking commit (7174e3d): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - please read the text below

Benchmarking this pull request means it may be perf-sensitive – we'll automatically label it not fit for rolling up. You can override this, but we strongly advise not to, due to possible changes in compiler perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please do so in sufficient writing along with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged. If not, please fix the regressions and do another perf run. If its results are neutral or positive, the label will be automatically removed.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.1%	[0.1%, 0.1%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.8%	[-2.5%, -0.2%]	5
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-3.0%	[-5.7%, -0.3%]	2
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.8%	[-2.5%, -0.2%]	5

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 2.2%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	2.2%	[2.2%, 2.2%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	2.2%	[2.2%, 2.2%]	1

Cycles

Results (secondary 0.6%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	3.6%	[3.6%, 3.6%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.3%	[-2.3%, -2.3%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 475.312s -> 475.493s (0.04%)
Artifact size: 388.16 MiB -> 388.16 MiB (0.00%)

notriddle · 2025-10-15T20:26:02Z

The "regression" is not in a doc build, so can't be real.

rustbot · 2025-10-15T20:26:07Z

Some changes occurred in HTML/CSS/JS.

cc @GuillaumeGomez, @jsha, @lolbinarycat

These commits modify the Cargo.lock file. Unintentional changes to Cargo.lock can be introduced when switching branches and rebasing PRs.

If this was unintentional then you should revert the changes before this PR is merged.
Otherwise, you can ignore this comment.

rustbot · 2025-10-15T20:26:09Z

r? @GuillaumeGomez

rustbot has assigned @GuillaumeGomez.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

GuillaumeGomez · 2025-10-16T09:13:27Z

Nice perf improvement! :)

@bors r+ rollup=iffy

bors · 2025-10-16T09:13:30Z

📌 Commit fdeb363 has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

It is now in the queue for this repository.

…meGomez rustdoc-search: stringdex 0.0.2 Two index format tweaks that reduce the size of the standard library, compiler, and wordnet dictionary when I test it. CC rust-lang#146048 FF Profiler output: https://share.firefox.dev/4onH5xP Preview: https://notriddle.com/rustdoc-html-demo-12/stringdex-002/std/index.html

Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - #144936 (CFI: Fix types that implement Fn, FnMut, or FnOnce) - #147468 (Implement fs api set_times and set_times_nofollow) - #147660 (rustdoc-search: stringdex 0.0.2) - #147735 (Micro-optimization in `FunctionCx::initialize_locals`) - #147764 (Undo CopyForDeref assertion in const qualif) - #147783 (bootstrap: migrate to object 0.37) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup

bors · 2025-10-17T15:42:37Z

⌛ Testing commit fdeb363 with merge f464759...

bors · 2025-10-17T18:52:33Z

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: GuillaumeGomez
Pushing f464759 to master...

github-actions · 2025-10-17T18:55:53Z

What is this?

This is an experimental post-merge analysis report that shows differences in test outcomes between the merged PR and its parent PR.

Comparing a41214f (parent) -> f464759 (this PR)

Test differences

Show 2 test diffs

2 doctest diffs were found. These are ignored, as they are noisy.

Test dashboard

Run

cargo run --manifest-path src/ci/citool/Cargo.toml -- \
    test-dashboard f46475914de626785090a05ae037578aaa119fc8 --output-dir test-dashboard

And then open test-dashboard/index.html in your browser to see an overview of all executed tests.

Job duration changes

aarch64-apple: 10882.4s -> 8134.7s (-25.2%)
x86_64-gnu-tools: 2974.1s -> 3413.4s (14.8%)
aarch64-gnu-llvm-20-2: 2181.2s -> 2482.4s (13.8%)
x86_64-mingw-1: 10533.3s -> 9307.5s (-11.6%)
dist-ohos-armv7: 4085.8s -> 4488.0s (9.8%)
dist-apple-various: 3348.0s -> 3666.2s (9.5%)
aarch64-msvc-2: 4764.2s -> 5180.3s (8.7%)
i686-msvc-1: 9712.0s -> 10452.1s (7.6%)
dist-i686-msvc: 8313.6s -> 7744.3s (-6.8%)
test-various: 4395.1s -> 4099.6s (-6.7%)

How to interpret the job duration changes?

Job durations can vary a lot, based on the actual runner instance
that executed the job, system noise, invalidated caches, etc. The table above is provided
mostly for t-infra members, for simpler debugging of potential CI slow-downs.

rust-timer · 2025-10-17T20:03:20Z

Finished benchmarking commit (f464759): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.8%	[-2.5%, -0.2%]	5
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-1.1%	[-5.7%, -0.3%]	9
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.8%	[-2.5%, -0.2%]	5

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -3.1%, secondary -2.8%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-3.1%	[-3.1%, -3.1%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.8%	[-4.1%, -1.6%]	2
All ❌✅ (primary)	-3.1%	[-3.1%, -3.1%]	1

Cycles

Results (primary 2.6%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	2.6%	[2.6%, 2.6%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	2.6%	[2.6%, 2.6%]	1

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 476.516s -> 475.372s (-0.24%)
Artifact size: 390.37 MiB -> 390.39 MiB (0.00%)

rustdoc-search: stringdex 0.0.2

fdeb363

Two index format tweaks that reduce the size of the standard library, compiler, and wordnet dictionary when I test it.

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

rust-bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2025

Auto merge of #147660 - notriddle:stringdex-002, r=<try>

7174e3d

rustdoc-search: stringdex 0.0.2

rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Oct 14, 2025

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

rustbot added perf-regression Performance regression. and removed S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. labels Oct 14, 2025

notriddle marked this pull request as ready for review October 15, 2025 20:26

rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Oct 15, 2025

rustbot assigned GuillaumeGomez Oct 15, 2025

rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. label Oct 15, 2025

bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 16, 2025

samueltardieu mentioned this pull request Oct 17, 2025

Rollup of 6 pull requests #147807

Closed

bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Oct 17, 2025

bors merged commit f464759 into rust-lang:master Oct 17, 2025
12 checks passed

rustbot added this to the 1.92.0 milestone Oct 17, 2025

rustbot removed the perf-regression Performance regression. label Oct 17, 2025

notriddle deleted the stringdex-002 branch October 17, 2025 20:49

rustdoc-search: stringdex 0.0.2 #147660

rustdoc-search: stringdex 0.0.2 #147660

Conversation

notriddle commented Oct 14, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

notriddle commented Oct 14, 2025

Uh oh!

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

rust-bors bot commented Oct 14, 2025

Uh oh!

This comment has been minimized.

rust-timer commented Oct 14, 2025

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - please read the text below

Uh oh!

notriddle commented Oct 15, 2025

Uh oh!

rustbot commented Oct 15, 2025

Uh oh!

rustbot commented Oct 15, 2025

Uh oh!

GuillaumeGomez commented Oct 16, 2025

Uh oh!

bors commented Oct 16, 2025

Uh oh!

bors commented Oct 17, 2025

Uh oh!

bors commented Oct 17, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Oct 17, 2025

Test differences

Job duration changes

Uh oh!

rust-timer commented Oct 17, 2025

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

5 participants

notriddle commented Oct 14, 2025 •

edited

Loading