Remove inactive nvptx maintainer #150269
Merged
Remove inactive nvptx maintainer #150269
+0
−1
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Collaborator
|
Some changes occurred in src/doc/rustc/src/platform-support cc @Noratrieb |
rustbot
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Member
|
(Note that this is around holiday season for many folks, so I'd wait until at least around maybe mid Jan to give people a chance to respond. Please reping me again around like Jan 10-15 next year :D) @rustbot blocked (accounting for holiday season) |
rustbot
added
S-blocked
jieyouxu
added
the
O-NVPTX
Member
rustbot
removed
the
S-blocked
rust-bors
bot
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
Contributor
rust-bors bot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 10, 2026
Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - #150269 (Remove inactive nvptx maintainer) - #150713 (mgca: Type-check fields of struct expr const args) - #150765 (rustc_parse_format: improve error for missing `:` before `?` in format args) - #150847 (Fix broken documentation links to SipHash) - #150867 (rustdoc_json: Remove one call to `std::mem::take` in `after_krate`) - #150872 (Fix some loop block coercion diagnostics) - #150874 (Ignore `rustc-src-gpl` in fast try builds) - #150875 (Refactor artifact keep mode in bootstrap) - #150876 (Mention that `rustc_codegen_gcc` is a subtree in `rustc-dev-guide`) - #150882 (Supress unused_parens lint for guard patterns) - #150884 (Update bors email in CI postprocessing step) Failed merges: - #150869 (Emit error instead of delayed bug when meeting mismatch type for const tuple) r? @ghost
rust-bors bot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 10, 2026
Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - #150269 (Remove inactive nvptx maintainer) - #150713 (mgca: Type-check fields of struct expr const args) - #150765 (rustc_parse_format: improve error for missing `:` before `?` in format args) - #150847 (Fix broken documentation links to SipHash) - #150867 (rustdoc_json: Remove one call to `std::mem::take` in `after_krate`) - #150872 (Fix some loop block coercion diagnostics) - #150874 (Ignore `rustc-src-gpl` in fast try builds) - #150875 (Refactor artifact keep mode in bootstrap) - #150876 (Mention that `rustc_codegen_gcc` is a subtree in `rustc-dev-guide`) - #150882 (Supress unused_parens lint for guard patterns) - #150884 (Update bors email in CI postprocessing step) Failed merges: - #150869 (Emit error instead of delayed bug when meeting mismatch type for const tuple) r? @ghost
rust-timer
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 11, 2026
Rollup merge of #150269 - update-nvptx-maintainers, r=jieyouxu Remove inactive nvptx maintainer Since I just saw the discussion in [#t-compiler > Starting to enforce Tier 2-to-3 downgrade](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/Starting.20to.20enforce.20Tier.202-to-3.20downgrade/with/564788312), and I saw him pinged on PRs or issues. His last active open-source contributions were in early 2022: https://github.com/RDambrosio016 and IIRC he also mentioned that he had moved on. ping @RDambrosio016 so you can confirm or correct me, if you want to chime in. I also pinged him on Zulip. cc @kjetilkjeka who is the other maintainer and active on related issues/prs for his target. I'd leave it open for a while, but r? @jieyouxu
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 12, 2026
Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang/rust#150269 (Remove inactive nvptx maintainer) - rust-lang/rust#150713 (mgca: Type-check fields of struct expr const args) - rust-lang/rust#150765 (rustc_parse_format: improve error for missing `:` before `?` in format args) - rust-lang/rust#150847 (Fix broken documentation links to SipHash) - rust-lang/rust#150867 (rustdoc_json: Remove one call to `std::mem::take` in `after_krate`) - rust-lang/rust#150872 (Fix some loop block coercion diagnostics) - rust-lang/rust#150874 (Ignore `rustc-src-gpl` in fast try builds) - rust-lang/rust#150875 (Refactor artifact keep mode in bootstrap) - rust-lang/rust#150876 (Mention that `rustc_codegen_gcc` is a subtree in `rustc-dev-guide`) - rust-lang/rust#150882 (Supress unused_parens lint for guard patterns) - rust-lang/rust#150884 (Update bors email in CI postprocessing step) Failed merges: - rust-lang/rust#150869 (Emit error instead of delayed bug when meeting mismatch type for const tuple) r? @ghost
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Since I just saw the discussion in #t-compiler > Starting to enforce Tier 2-to-3 downgrade, and I saw him pinged on PRs or issues. His last active open-source contributions were in early 2022: https://github.com/RDambrosio016 and IIRC he also mentioned that he had moved on.
ping @RDambrosio016 so you can confirm or correct me, if you want to chime in. I also pinged him on Zulip.
cc @kjetilkjeka who is the other maintainer and active on related issues/prs for his target.
I'd leave it open for a while, but
r? @jieyouxu