-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.4k
llvm: Update reliable_f16 configuration for LLVM22
#150908
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
+6
−6
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Since yesterday, the LLVM `main` branch should have working `f16` on all platforms that Rust supports; this will be LLVM version 22, so update how `cfg(target_has_reliable_f16)` is set to reflect this. Within the rust-lang organization, this currently has no effect. The goal is to start catching problems as early as possible in external CI that runs top-of-tree rust against top-of-tree LLVM, and once testing for the rust-lang bump to LLVM 22 starts. Hopefully this will mean that we can fix any problems that show up before the bump actually happens, meaning `f16` will be about ready for stabilization at that point (with some considerations for the GCC patch at [1] propagating). References: * llvm/llvm-project@919021b * llvm/llvm-project@054ee2f * llvm/llvm-project@db26ce5 * llvm/llvm-project@549d7c4 * llvm/llvm-project@4903c62 [1]: gcc-mirror/gcc@8b6a18e
Contributor
Author
|
Per @maurer that label makes things get picked up by https://buildkite.com/llvm-project/rust-llvm-integrate-prototype/ |
Contributor
|
@bors r+ rollup |
Contributor
Zalathar
added a commit
to Zalathar/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 11, 2026
llvm: Update `reliable_f16` configuration for LLVM22 Since yesterday, the LLVM `main` branch should have working `f16` on all platforms that Rust supports; this will be LLVM version 22, so update how `cfg(target_has_reliable_f16)` is set to reflect this. Within the rust-lang organization, this currently has no effect. The goal is to start catching problems as early as possible in external CI that runs top-of-tree rust against top-of-tree LLVM, and once testing for the rust-lang bump to LLVM 22 starts. Hopefully this will mean that we can fix any problems that show up before the bump actually happens, meaning `f16` will be about ready for stabilization at that point (with some considerations for the GCC patch at [1] propagating). References: * llvm/llvm-project@919021b * llvm/llvm-project@054ee2f * llvm/llvm-project@db26ce5 * llvm/llvm-project@549d7c4 * llvm/llvm-project@4903c62 [1]: gcc-mirror/gcc@8b6a18e
Zalathar
added a commit
to Zalathar/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 11, 2026
llvm: Update `reliable_f16` configuration for LLVM22 Since yesterday, the LLVM `main` branch should have working `f16` on all platforms that Rust supports; this will be LLVM version 22, so update how `cfg(target_has_reliable_f16)` is set to reflect this. Within the rust-lang organization, this currently has no effect. The goal is to start catching problems as early as possible in external CI that runs top-of-tree rust against top-of-tree LLVM, and once testing for the rust-lang bump to LLVM 22 starts. Hopefully this will mean that we can fix any problems that show up before the bump actually happens, meaning `f16` will be about ready for stabilization at that point (with some considerations for the GCC patch at [1] propagating). References: * llvm/llvm-project@919021b * llvm/llvm-project@054ee2f * llvm/llvm-project@db26ce5 * llvm/llvm-project@549d7c4 * llvm/llvm-project@4903c62 [1]: gcc-mirror/gcc@8b6a18e
rust-bors bot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 11, 2026
Rollup of 14 pull requests Successful merges: - #148941 (stabilize `Peekable::next_if_map` (`#![feature(peekable_next_if_map)]`)) - #150368 (adding Ordering enum to minicore.rs, importing minicore in "tests/assembly-llvm/rust-abi-arg-attr.rs" test file) - #150668 (Unix implementation for stdio set/take/replace) - #150743 (Reword the collect() docs) - #150776 (Fix the connect_error test on FreeBSD 15+) - #150781 (Use `rand` crate more idiomatically) - #150786 (mGCA: Support array expression as direct const arguments) - #150812 (Bump `diesel` to the most recent commit in `cargotest`) - #150862 (std: sys: fs: uefi: Implement File::flush) - #150873 (Reenable GCC CI download) - #150908 (llvm: Update `reliable_f16` configuration for LLVM22) - #150918 (std: sys: fs: uefi: Implement File::seek) - #150922 (Subscribe myself to attr parsing) - #150930 (Remove special case for `AllowedTargets::CrateLevel`) r? @ghost
rust-bors bot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 11, 2026
Rollup of 14 pull requests Successful merges: - #148941 (stabilize `Peekable::next_if_map` (`#![feature(peekable_next_if_map)]`)) - #150368 (adding Ordering enum to minicore.rs, importing minicore in "tests/assembly-llvm/rust-abi-arg-attr.rs" test file) - #150668 (Unix implementation for stdio set/take/replace) - #150743 (Reword the collect() docs) - #150776 (Fix the connect_error test on FreeBSD 15+) - #150781 (Use `rand` crate more idiomatically) - #150812 (Bump `diesel` to the most recent commit in `cargotest`) - #150862 (std: sys: fs: uefi: Implement File::flush) - #150873 (Reenable GCC CI download) - #150908 (llvm: Update `reliable_f16` configuration for LLVM22) - #150918 (std: sys: fs: uefi: Implement File::seek) - #150922 (Subscribe myself to attr parsing) - #150930 (Remove special case for `AllowedTargets::CrateLevel`) - #150942 (Port `#[rustc_has_incoherent_inherent_impls]` to attribute parser) Failed merges: - #150943 (Port `#[must_not_suspend]` to attribute parser) r? @ghost
rust-timer
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 11, 2026
Rollup merge of #150908 - llvm-f16-cfg, r=nikic llvm: Update `reliable_f16` configuration for LLVM22 Since yesterday, the LLVM `main` branch should have working `f16` on all platforms that Rust supports; this will be LLVM version 22, so update how `cfg(target_has_reliable_f16)` is set to reflect this. Within the rust-lang organization, this currently has no effect. The goal is to start catching problems as early as possible in external CI that runs top-of-tree rust against top-of-tree LLVM, and once testing for the rust-lang bump to LLVM 22 starts. Hopefully this will mean that we can fix any problems that show up before the bump actually happens, meaning `f16` will be about ready for stabilization at that point (with some considerations for the GCC patch at [1] propagating). References: * llvm/llvm-project@919021b * llvm/llvm-project@054ee2f * llvm/llvm-project@db26ce5 * llvm/llvm-project@549d7c4 * llvm/llvm-project@4903c62 [1]: gcc-mirror/gcc@8b6a18e
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to rust-lang/miri
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 12, 2026
Rollup of 14 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang/rust#148941 (stabilize `Peekable::next_if_map` (`#![feature(peekable_next_if_map)]`)) - rust-lang/rust#150368 (adding Ordering enum to minicore.rs, importing minicore in "tests/assembly-llvm/rust-abi-arg-attr.rs" test file) - rust-lang/rust#150668 (Unix implementation for stdio set/take/replace) - rust-lang/rust#150743 (Reword the collect() docs) - rust-lang/rust#150776 (Fix the connect_error test on FreeBSD 15+) - rust-lang/rust#150781 (Use `rand` crate more idiomatically) - rust-lang/rust#150812 (Bump `diesel` to the most recent commit in `cargotest`) - rust-lang/rust#150862 (std: sys: fs: uefi: Implement File::flush) - rust-lang/rust#150873 (Reenable GCC CI download) - rust-lang/rust#150908 (llvm: Update `reliable_f16` configuration for LLVM22) - rust-lang/rust#150918 (std: sys: fs: uefi: Implement File::seek) - rust-lang/rust#150922 (Subscribe myself to attr parsing) - rust-lang/rust#150930 (Remove special case for `AllowedTargets::CrateLevel`) - rust-lang/rust#150942 (Port `#[rustc_has_incoherent_inherent_impls]` to attribute parser) Failed merges: - rust-lang/rust#150943 (Port `#[must_not_suspend]` to attribute parser) r? @ghost
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
A-LLVM
Area: Code generation parts specific to LLVM. Both correctness bugs and optimization-related issues.
llvm-main
Marks PRs that are making Rust work with LLVM main (this label is consumed by CI tooling)
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Since yesterday, the LLVM
mainbranch should have workingf16on all platforms that Rust supports; this will be LLVM version 22, so update howcfg(target_has_reliable_f16)is set to reflect this.Within the rust-lang organization, this currently has no effect. The goal is to start catching problems as early as possible in external CI that runs top-of-tree rust against top-of-tree LLVM, and once testing for the rust-lang bump to LLVM 22 starts. Hopefully this will mean that we can fix any problems that show up before the bump actually happens, meaning
f16will be about ready for stabilization at that point (with some considerations for the GCC patch at 1 propagating).References:
r? @nikic