Convert a first batch of diagnostics to have error codes #15615
Conversation
|
I'm not sure this is the right way to go about this. Converting all the diagnostics to have codes is tempting but maybe we should instead do it on an individual basis when we're confident a diagnostic is going to stay. I reckon all the language changes before 1.0 will have significant impact on the stability of these. |
|
cc @brson I think that having error codes before we have explanations is useful because if someone runs into error EXXXX without an explanation it's a great way to get started contributing to rust (if you're up to the task!). I personally see the error codes as frozen for life once emitted, but I have a feeling we can continue to add digits in the future if necessary, or even change letters, so I don't think we have to worry too much about wasting some codes here and there. |
|
@alexcrichton Good point! Which reminds me I should add a note to the compiler's output on how to help contribute descriptions for the undocumented diagnostics. |
…-lints, r=Veykril Refactor/fix clippy lints As title says.
No description provided.