-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
Fix TwoWaySearcher to work when used with periodic needles. #16612
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hm, I'm not 100% sure this handles not-exactly-period strings correctly, e.g.
naXYZna
,naxyzna
, playpen(I don't know this algorithm, so it might be doing the right thing, but it certainly seems weird that those two differ.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Your link is mangled for me, so I'm not sure what you're referring to. Are you worried about
maximal_suffix
returning different factorizations for "naXYZna" and "naxyzna"?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually, I'm worried about that.
maximal_suffix
is giving different periods for "naXYZna" and "naxyzna", which seems to contradict how my port of glibc'scritical_factorization
function works.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@huonw Nevermind, my port had a bug. I think what I have in the PR is correct. The
maximal_suffix
returns(i, p)
wherei
is the starting position of the suffix found andp
is the period of the suffix. So the factorization for "naxyzna" is ("naxy", "zna") and the factorization for "naXYZna" is ("na", "XYZna") (because the "maximal" in the function name is based on lexicographic ordering, not length). And actually, my comment in the code was wrong. It's actually checking whether the suffix is periodic. So that's why one is periodic and not the other. I will update the comments to make this clear.