Avoid false ambiguity in multidispatch trait resolution #18022
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
actually for `Fn`, `FnMut`, or `FnOnce`. Fixes rust-lang#18019
detected (correctly) that there was only one impl and hence ignored the `Self` bound completely. I (semi-arbitrarily) elected to delect the impl, forcing the trait matcher to be more conservative and lean on the where clauses in scope, yielding the original error message.
lnicola
pushed a commit
to lnicola/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 25, 2024
feat: IDE support for `asm!` expressions Fixes rust-lang/rust-analyzer#10461, Fixes rust-lang/rust-analyzer#6031 Progresses rust-lang/rust-analyzer#11621 Notably this only works for asm expressions not items yet. Most IDE features work, mainly completions need extra logic still.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Only consider impliciy unboxed closure impl if the obligation is actually for
Fn,FnMut, orFnOnce.Fixes #18019
r? @pcwalton