Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove struct_variants from tests #19124

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 22, 2014

Conversation

Kintaro
Copy link
Contributor

@Kintaro Kintaro commented Nov 20, 2014

Removed usage of struct_variant feature from all tests.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @alexcrichton (or someone else) soon.

@bstrie
Copy link
Contributor

bstrie commented Nov 20, 2014

Thanks for the cleanup!

alexcrichton added a commit to alexcrichton/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2014
Removed usage of struct_variant feature from all tests.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2014
…trie

Removed usage of struct_variant feature from all tests.
@bors bors closed this Nov 22, 2014
@bors bors merged commit f950e3c into rust-lang:master Nov 22, 2014
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2015
…ture, r=sanxiyn

The struct_variant feature was accepted and is no longer feature gated.
See #19122, #19124

§6.1.6 Enumerations shows an example of a struct-like enum variant.
dlrobertson pushed a commit to dlrobertson/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2018
The struct_variant feature was accepted and is no longer feature gated.
See rust-lang#19122, rust-lang#19124

§6.1.6 Enumerations shows an example of a struct-like enum variant.
lnicola pushed a commit to lnicola/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants