Fix mem-categorization of an overloaded autoderef applied to result of an overloaded index #20751
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
an `Option<&Expr>` like everything else.
more modern terminology and update tests accordingly.
… implicit deref that is associated with an overloaded index, we should not consult the method lookup table. This deref is *always* a deref of an `&T` and hence is never overloaded (and is also not present in the tables; it has no "id" or other associated key).
`assert_no_late_bound_regions`) and to give more helpful debug output.
alexcrichton
added a commit
to alexcrichton/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 8, 2015
Issue rust-lang#20232. Fun. r? @eddyb you prob know this system best
lnicola
added a commit
to lnicola/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 1, 2025
Update memchr to 2.7.6
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue #20232. Fun.
r? @eddyb you prob know this system best