-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
snapshot + s/range(a, b)/a..b/g + s/Show/Debug/g cleanup #21677
Conversation
r=me with a deprecation warning about |
@bors: r=alexcrichton 9b8f07f |
I see a bunch of |
@tshepang yes, there are bunch of places where the |
Note: Do not merge until we get a newer snapshot that includes #21374 There was some type inference fallout (see 4th commit) because type inference with `a..b` is not as good as with `range(a, b)` (see #21672). r? @alexcrichton
💔 Test failed - auto-win-32-opt |
@bors: retry |
sed -i 's/ range(\([^,]*\), *\([^()]*\))\./ (\1\.\.\2)\./g' **/*.rs
sed -i 's/in range(\([^,]*\), *\([^()]*\))/in \1\.\.\2/g' **/*.rs
Note: Do not merge until we get a newer snapshot that includes #21374 There was some type inference fallout (see 4th commit) because type inference with `a..b` is not as good as with `range(a, b)` (see #21672). r? @alexcrichton
Note: Do not merge until we get a newer snapshot that includes #21374
There was some type inference fallout (see 4th commit) because type inference with
a..b
is not as good as withrange(a, b)
(see #21672).r? @alexcrichton