Skip to content

fmt.rs reference to deprecated {:08d} format removed #22925

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 2, 2015

Conversation

leonardinius
Copy link

Addresses #22646

Removes deprecated {:08d} format from the module documentation.
{:08} should be used instead now.

Removes deprecated `{:08d}` format from the module documentation.
`{:08}` should be used instead now.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @huonw (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. The way Github handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see CONTRIBUTING.md for more information.

@leonardinius
Copy link
Author

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned steveklabnik and unassigned huonw Mar 1, 2015
@leonardinius leonardinius changed the title fmt.rs reference to depreceted {:08d} format removed fmt.rs reference to deprecated {:08d} format removed Mar 1, 2015
@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+ c04c963 rollup

Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2015
…veklabnik

 Addresses rust-lang#22646

Removes deprecated `{:08d}` format from the module documentation.
`{:08}` should be used instead now.
@bors bors merged commit c04c963 into rust-lang:master Mar 2, 2015
@leonardinius leonardinius deleted the issue-22646-fmt branch March 4, 2015 06:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants