Skip to content

Remove incorrect statement about raw pointers. #23531

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 20, 2015
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 0 additions & 4 deletions src/doc/trpl/unsafe.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -93,10 +93,6 @@ offered by the Rust language and libraries. For example, they
- are plain-old-data, that is, they don't move ownership, again unlike
`Box`, hence the Rust compiler cannot protect against bugs like
use-after-free;
- are considered sendable (if their contents is considered sendable),
so the compiler offers no assistance with ensuring their use is
thread-safe; for example, one can concurrently access a `*mut i32`
from two threads without synchronization.
- lack any form of lifetimes, unlike `&`, and so the compiler cannot
reason about dangling pointers; and
- have no guarantees about aliasing or mutability other than mutation
Expand Down