Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Better description on Arc/Rc clone behavior #23743

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 28, 2015

Conversation

Adenilson
Copy link
Contributor

Adding more information about the behavior of Arc/Rc when you perform a clone() call.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @brson (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. The way Github handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see CONTRIBUTING.md for more information.

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 26, 2015

📌 Commit 7d3bf47 has been approved by steveklabnik

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

Thank you! :D

Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2015
…eklabnik

 Adding more information about the behavior of Arc/Rc when you perform a clone() call.
alexcrichton added a commit to alexcrichton/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2015
Adding more information about the behavior of Arc/Rc when you perform a clone() call.
@bors bors merged commit 7d3bf47 into rust-lang:master Mar 28, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants