-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Updating installing-rust.md - add ldconfig
workaround on install
#24529
Conversation
Add a workaround for the error (I twice personally have) observed when following the installation instructions.
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @pcwalton (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. The way Github handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. Please see CONTRIBUTING.md for more information. |
ldconfig
workaround on install
r? @brson |
This must be a bug in rust-installer, since it is supposed to be running |
We've gotten lots of people in IRC over the last two or three weeks I'd say who needed to run |
Yuck. I will investigate this problem very soon. |
There's a related issue where Fedora does not configure the dynamic linker to look in /usr/local/lib so ldconfig doesn't work, but that doesn't seem to be case here since a subsequent invocation does work: rust-lang/rust-installer#30 |
Both have Ubuntu 14.04 running on them. |
This looks pretty similar to rust-lang/rustup#3 |
The underlying issue has been fixed in rustup rust-lang/rustup@fa82250. Thanks for the patch and report. |
I can confirm it works. Thanks. |
Add a workaround for the error (I twice personally have) observed when following the installation instructions:
A better fix would be to work out why we appear to need to run
ldconfig
before the install works. If you agree then perhaps this can be changed into an issue and the docs left alone?