Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify intention wrt integers #25002

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 1, 2015
Merged

Clarify intention wrt integers #25002

merged 1 commit into from
May 1, 2015

Conversation

steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

Fixes #24767

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member Author

r? @pnkfelix

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned pnkfelix and unassigned huonw Apr 30, 2015
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @huonw

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+ 1e40360 rollup

Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request May 1, 2015
Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request May 1, 2015
Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request May 1, 2015
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request May 1, 2015
@bors bors merged commit 1e40360 into rust-lang:master May 1, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

std::fmt future-proofing: should precision be static error for integral types?
6 participants