-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 13.9k
Rollup of 8 pull requests #25827
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 8 pull requests #25827
Conversation
Manishearth
commented
May 27, 2015
- Successful merges: Add note about filesystems to fs::rename #25128, Document #[repr] on non-C-like enums #25651, Document std::env::const values #25668, docs: Improve descriptions for some methods in core::cell. #25726, Use an iterator for reader::tagged_docs. #25760, Remove redundant compiler check. Allow CC override #25792, Add a WONTFIX message to a failing test. #25806, Manpages #25807
- Failed merges:
Currently, there are two conditional blocks that exist to check for "clang or gcc"
On line 866:
```
if [ -z "$CFG_ENABLE_CLANG" -a -z "$CFG_GCC" ]
then
err "either clang or gcc is required"
fi
```
and on line 1019:
```
if [ -z "$CC" -a -z "$CFG_ENABLE_CLANG" -a -z "$CFG_GCC" ]
then
err "either clang or gcc is required"
fi
```
Given the order of the clauses, this results in the "either clang or gcc is required" error from the earlier block, (even) when CC is set.
The expected behaviour is to honour user-flags, in this case CC.
Aside from removing all hand-holdy compiler checks in favour of actual compiler *feature* checks, this change removes the redundant former block in favour of the latter block, which appears designed to allow the expected behaviour.
Estimating August as the release date for 1.2.0.
rustc -C target-cpu=help is no longer supported. Recommend the llc tool intead like 'rustc --help'.
|
r? @Aatch (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
|
@bors: r+ p-10 |
|
📌 Commit 644046f has been approved by |
Currently part of the description of the `into_inner` method of `UnsafeCell` seems backwards.
|
@bors: r+ p=20 |
|
📌 Commit b6fbabb has been approved by |
|
⌛ Testing commit b6fbabb with merge 02453f0... |
|
💔 Test failed - auto-linux-64-x-android-t |
Currently, there are two conditional blocks that exist to check for "clang or gcc"
On line 866:
```
if [ -z "$CFG_ENABLE_CLANG" -a -z "$CFG_GCC" ]
then
err "either clang or gcc is required"
fi
```
and on line 1019:
```
if [ -z "$CC" -a -z "$CFG_ENABLE_CLANG" -a -z "$CFG_GCC" ]
then
err "either clang or gcc is required"
fi
```
Given the order of the clauses, this results in the "either clang or gcc is required" error from the earlier block, (even) when CC is set.
The expected behaviour is to honour user-flags, in this case CC.
Aside from removing all hand-holdy compiler checks in favour of actual compiler *feature* checks, this change removes the redundant former block in favour of the latter block, which appears designed to allow the expected behaviour.
Quick update to fix two manpage issues I noticed in rust-lang#25689.
|
@bors: r+ force |
|
📌 Commit 6090d15 has been approved by |