-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
Add priority policy to RWLock api doc #25988
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @alexcrichton (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. The way Github handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
@@ -24,6 +24,10 @@ use sys_common::rwlock as sys; | |||
/// of the underlying data (exclusive access) and the read portion of this lock | |||
/// typically allows for read-only access (shared access). | |||
/// | |||
/// The priority policy of the lock is dependant on the underlying operating | |||
/// sytems implementation and therefore may vary with no guarantees of any |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
system's
I am unsure how true this is, but if it is, 👍 from me |
@@ -24,6 +24,10 @@ use sys_common::rwlock as sys; | |||
/// of the underlying data (exclusive access) and the read portion of this lock | |||
/// typically allows for read-only access (shared access). | |||
/// | |||
/// The priority policy of the lock is dependant on the underlying operating | |||
/// sytems implementation and therefore may vary with no guarantees of any | |||
/// policy being used. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"any particular policy"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"any particular policy"
Thanks! Could you also squash the commits together? |
Updated with the changes. Thanks for the help |
The priority policy of RWLock is not specified, and the fact there is no policy should probably be specified.
The priority policy of RWLock is not specified, and the fact there is no policy should probably be specified.