Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement RFC 1058 #26966

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 12, 2015
Merged

Implement RFC 1058 #26966

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 12, 2015

Conversation

nagisa
Copy link
Member

@nagisa nagisa commented Jul 11, 2015

Fixes #26906

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @aturon

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@nagisa nagisa force-pushed the tail-init branch 6 times, most recently from cbfce11 to 8418fe9 Compare July 11, 2015 13:27
@@ -280,34 +280,34 @@ impl<T> [T] {
core_slice::SliceExt::first_mut(self)
}

/// Returns all but the first element of a slice.
#[unstable(feature = "slice_extras", reason = "likely to be renamed")]
/// Returns the first and all the rest elements of a slice.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

s/rest elements/rest of the elements/

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

/// Returns all but the first element of a slice.
#[unstable(feature = "slice_extras", reason = "likely to be renamed")]
/// Returns the first and all the rest of the elements of a slice.
#[stable(feature = "rfc1058", since = "1.3.0")]
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a fairly significant change in terms of functionality so I don't think we should insta-stabilize these methods (e.g. leave them as #[unstable] for a little longer). Could you also give it a more descriptive feature name than "rfc1058"? Just to help error messages and such later on down the road.

Finally, could you leave the old tail methods and such, but #[deprecate] them in favor of these new methods?

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

Thanks @nagisa!

@nagisa nagisa force-pushed the tail-init branch 2 times, most recently from 9cff581 to db8d3cd Compare July 11, 2015 21:34
@nagisa
Copy link
Member Author

nagisa commented Jul 11, 2015

Comments addressed.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+ 7a90865

Thanks!

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2015
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 12, 2015

⌛ Testing commit 7a90865 with merge 50d305e...

@bors bors merged commit 7a90865 into rust-lang:master Jul 12, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants