Skip to content

Slightly improved macro diagnostics #27849

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 19, 2015
Merged

Slightly improved macro diagnostics #27849

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 19, 2015

Conversation

jonas-schievink
Copy link
Contributor

And some small indentation/code style fixes in the macro parser.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @nikomatsakis (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. The way Github handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+ looks nice!

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 19, 2015

📌 Commit 5e8d39e has been approved by nikomatsakis

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 19, 2015
And some small indentation/code style fixes in the macro parser.
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 19, 2015

⌛ Testing commit 5e8d39e with merge 7e13fae...

@bors bors merged commit 5e8d39e into rust-lang:master Aug 19, 2015
@jonas-schievink jonas-schievink deleted the macro-errors branch December 26, 2015 10:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants