Skip to content

Rollup of 7 pull requests #28911

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 15 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

tshepang and others added 15 commits September 28, 2015 11:13
Currently the explain command requires full erorr codes, complete with
the leading zeros and the E at the beginning. This commit changes that,
if you don't supply a full erorr code then the error number is padded
out to the required size and the E is added to the beginning.

This means that where previously you would need to write E0001, you can
now write 0001, 001, 01 or jsut 1 to refer to the same error.
This adds a chapter to the nightly section of the book on leveraging and
implementing the `#![allocator]` attribute to write custom allocators as well as
explaining the current situation with allocators.
…klabnik

This adds a chapter to the nightly section of the book on leveraging and
implementing the `#![allocator]` attribute to write custom allocators as well as
explaining the current situation with allocators.
Currently the explain command line flag requires full error codes, complete with
the leading zeros and the E at the beginning. This commit changes that,
if you don't supply a full error code then the error number is padded
out to the required size and the E is added to the beginning.

This means that where previously you would need to write E0001, you can
now write 0001, 001, 01 or just 1 to refer to the same error.
@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: r+ p=1

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 8, 2015

📌 Commit ad332c9 has been approved by steveklabnik

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @alexcrichton

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member Author

I verified that make check-stage2 runs here, so hopefully this will clear out the whole queue soon.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 8, 2015

⌛ Testing commit ad332c9 with merge 2b80b0c...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 8, 2015

💔 Test failed - auto-win-msvc-64-opt

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member Author

I don't know what's up

@steveklabnik steveklabnik deleted the rollup branch October 8, 2015 17:53
@Centril Centril added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Oct 24, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants