Skip to content

Rollup of 5 pull requests #30793

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 10 commits into from
Closed

Rollup of 5 pull requests #30793

wants to merge 10 commits into from

Conversation

jseyfried and others added 10 commits January 6, 2016 07:04
Previously it was returning a value, mostly for the two reasons:

* Cloning Lvalue is very cheap most of the time (i.e. when Lvalue is not a Projection);
* There’s users who want &mut lvalue and there’s users who want &lvalue. Returning a value allows
  to make either one easier when pattern matching (i.e. Some(ref dest) or Some(ref mut dest)).

However, I’m now convinced this is an invalid approach. Namely the users which want a mutable
reference may modify the Lvalue in-place, but the changes won’t be reflected in the final MIR,
since the Lvalue modified is merely a clone.

Instead, we have two accessors `destination` and `destination_mut` which return a reference to the
destination in desired mode.
…e, r=nrc

Fix a bug allowing an item and an external crate to collide so long as the external crate is declared after the item. For example,
```rust
mod core { pub fn f() {} } // This would be an error if it followed the `extern crate`
extern crate core; // This declaration is shadowed by the preceding module

fn main() { core::f(); }
```
This is a [breaking-change], but it looks unlikely to cause breakage in practice, and any breakage can be fixed by removing colliding `extern crate` declarations, which are shadowed and hence unused.
…elwoerister

Previously it was returning a clone, mostly for the two reasons:

* Cloning Lvalue is very cheap most of the time (i.e. when Lvalue is not a Projection);
* There’s users who want &mut lvalue and there’s users who want &lvalue. Returning a value allows
  to make either one easier when pattern matching (i.e. Some(ref dest) or Some(ref mut dest)).

However, I’m now convinced this is an invalid approach. Namely the users which want a mutable
reference may modify the Lvalue in-place, but the changes won’t be reflected in the final MIR,
since the Lvalue modified is merely a clone.

Instead, we have two accessors `destination` and `destination_mut` which return a reference to the
destination in desired mode.

r? @nikomatsakis
This just removes the `Some()` that appeared around terminators in MIR text output after rust-lang#30481 (cc @nagisa). The graphviz is already fixed.

r? @eddyb
…elb1

Fixes rust-lang#30772

We used to have a untested special case which didn’t really work anyway, because of lacking casts. This PR removes the case in question.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @arielb1

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@nagisa nagisa closed this Jan 9, 2016
@Centril Centril added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Oct 24, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants