Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix C macro example #30986

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 19, 2016
Merged

Fix C macro example #30986

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 19, 2016

Conversation

ziyunli
Copy link
Contributor

@ziyunli ziyunli commented Jan 17, 2016

Sorry for nitpicking, but I think the example of the expanded macro should be wrapped inside a pair of curly braces to match the macro definition. Also the current example triggers a variable redefinition error.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @alexcrichton (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+ 8a82970 rollup

Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 18, 2016
Sorry for nitpicking, but I think the example of the expanded macro should be wrapped inside a pair of curly braces to match the macro definition. Also the current example triggers a variable redefinition error.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 18, 2016
@bors bors merged commit 8a82970 into rust-lang:master Jan 19, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants