Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[breaking batch] Remove some unnecessary indirection from AST structures #31583

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 12, 2016

Conversation

petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

cc #31487
plugin-[breaking-change]

The AST part of #30087

r? @Manishearth

@Manishearth
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

LGTM. Not sure why Annotatable still uses P, but that's okay.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 11, 2016

📌 Commit 77cc576 has been approved by Manishearth

@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor Author

Huh, it seems like without prioritizing two PRs approved roughly at the same time have to be extremely lucky to end up in the same nightly.

@Manishearth
Copy link
Member

@bors p=10

shit sorry, I forgot

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 12, 2016

⌛ Testing commit 77cc576 with merge c7640aa...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2016
@bors bors merged commit 77cc576 into rust-lang:master Feb 12, 2016
lambda-fairy added a commit to lambda-fairy/maud that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2016
@petrochenkov petrochenkov deleted the indi_ast branch September 21, 2016 19:49
@@ -65,6 +65,10 @@ impl<T: 'static> P<T> {
{
f(*self.ptr)
}
/// Equivalent to and_then(|x| x)
pub fn unwrap(self) -> T {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wow I'm years late to this but see #54277 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants