-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
Reword the short diagnostic for E0509 #33676
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
r? @arielb1 (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
This needs to update the test suite. (Tests will fail otherwise.) |
I agree. Big 👍!
True. |
5aacf17
to
60fa200
Compare
D'oh! Can you tell it's my first time touching diagnostics? 😄 I think I updated all tests now (local build/tests not finished yet). |
Travis is taking its sweet time with the build, but at least |
Failed tidy. :( |
60fa200
to
ac6da22
Compare
Ugh. Fixed now. |
@bors r+ rollup |
📌 Commit ac6da22 has been approved by |
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #33688) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
Saying that a type *implements* a trait is much more idiomatic than saying it *defines* the trait.
ac6da22
to
e575d19
Compare
Rebased |
@bors r+ rollup |
📌 Commit e575d19 has been approved by |
Reword the short diagnostic for E0509 Saying that a type *implements* a trait is much more idiomatic than saying it *defines* the trait.
Saying that a type implements a trait is much more idiomatic than saying it defines the trait.