Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix proc macro def ids #37793

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 17, 2016
Merged

Conversation

jseyfried
Copy link
Contributor

Update some CStore methods to also work correctly with proc macro def ids.
Fixes #37788.
r? @nrc

Copy link
Member

@nrc nrc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

r = me with a comment on the test

extern crate derive_a_b;

fn main() {
std::cell::Cell::new(0) //~ ERROR mismatched types
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you explain what this test is testing in a comment please

@jseyfried jseyfried force-pushed the fix_proc_macro_def_ids branch from 9690617 to 0172e46 Compare November 16, 2016 21:30
@jseyfried
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bors r=nrc

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 16, 2016

📌 Commit 0172e46 has been approved by nrc

@nox
Copy link
Contributor

nox commented Nov 17, 2016

Please someone prioritise that PR, procedural macros in nightlies are broken.

@jseyfried
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bors p=1

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 17, 2016

⌛ Testing commit 0172e46 with merge 5bd1e7f...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 17, 2016
Fix proc macro def ids

Update some `CStore` methods to also work correctly with proc macro def ids.
Fixes #37788.
r? @nrc
@bors bors merged commit 0172e46 into rust-lang:master Nov 17, 2016
sunjay added a commit to sunjay/rhino that referenced this pull request Nov 17, 2016
@jseyfried jseyfried deleted the fix_proc_macro_def_ids branch November 17, 2016 17:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants