Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove incorrect statement about the reference. #37820

Conversation

steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

This is not true.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

@steveklabnik: no appropriate reviewer found, use r? to override

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member Author

Or at least, I feel like this phrasing doesn't accurately convey what's going on. It might be incomplete, but it's not inaccurate. Maybe a replacement sentence is better? @rust-lang/docs

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

No need to debate upon this. Thanks for catching this @steveklabnik!

@bors: r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 17, 2016

📌 Commit 963ef08 has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

petrochenkov commented Nov 17, 2016

Wait, this is completely wrong.
The reference is out of date, it is incomplete and it may be inaccurate.

GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 17, 2016
…ence-comment, r=GuillaumeGomez

Remove incorrect statement about the reference.

This is not true.
@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: r-

This morning, looking at it again, I agree with @petrochenkov ; let me re-word this properly.

@steveklabnik steveklabnik deleted the remove-incorrect-reference-comment branch November 17, 2016 17:04
GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 23, 2016
…ence-comment, r=GuillaumeGomez

Clarify the reference's status.

The former wording only gave part of the picture, we want to be crystal
clear about this.

/cc @petrochenkov, who had concerns about rust-lang#37820
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants