-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Stabilize static lifetime in statics #39265
Conversation
@est31 nice |
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #39282) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
Rebased. |
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #39305) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
8ac8f0d
to
35191d0
Compare
Rebased on top of @eddyb 's PR. Its really great to see how the PR made this change much easier, so it must have been a good refactor! |
ping @nrc, would be a neat feature for 1.17! |
@alexcrichton its currently blocked by #37928 |
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #39563) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
Now that beta branched, I would like to ask for beta backport nomination, so that already 1.16 would have it stabilized. |
Backporting stabilizations is incredibly rare; I would prefer we didn't.
…On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 12:17 PM, est31 ***@***.***> wrote:
Now that beta branched, I would like to ask for beta backport nomination,
so that already 1.16 would have it stabilized.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#39265 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABsinz7uaODUek9-kH2vDy48sM0xfYfks5rZgQlgaJpZM4LrsNh>
.
|
@bors: r+ I would also recommend against backporting - I don't think we should reduce stabilisation time in general. |
📌 Commit 0361dcf has been approved by |
⌛ Testing commit 0361dcf with merge 443866e... |
💔 Test failed - status-travis |
@bors: r=nrc |
📌 Commit 1c8cb8a has been approved by |
#37928 is not yet closed, how is this being merged? |
@bors: r- |
85accdc
to
f8b6108
Compare
The documentation PR got merged, this is ready to be r+ed! |
📌 Commit f8b6108 has been approved by |
Stabilize static lifetime in statics Stabilize the "static_in_const" feature. Blockers before this PR can be merged: * [x] The [FCP with inclination to stabilize](#35897 (comment)) needs to be over. FCP lasts roughly three weeks, so will be over at Jan 25, aka this thursday. * [x] Documentation needs to be added (#37928) Closes #35897.
☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis |
Removing beta nomination as sentiment seems to be to not backport (also see #35897) |
Stabilize the "static_in_const" feature. Blockers before this PR can be merged:
Closes #35897.