Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

On-demandify the typechecking of item bodies #40540

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 29, 2017
Merged

On-demandify the typechecking of item bodies #40540

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 29, 2017

Conversation

cramertj
Copy link
Member

nikomatsakis
nikomatsakis requested changes Mar 16, 2017
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@nikomatsakis nikomatsakis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looking good, one minor quibble

src/librustc_typeck/check/mod.rs Outdated
}
}

fn typeck_item_bodies<'a, 'tcx>(tcx: TyCtxt<'a, 'tcx, 'tcx>, _: CrateNum) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

probably a good idea to have assert that the CrateNum is indeed LOCAL_CRATE

@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 20, 2017

📌 Commit ee584ac has been approved by nikomatsakis

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 20, 2017

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #39628) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

eddyb
eddyb reviewed Mar 21, 2017
View reviewed changes
src/librustc_typeck/check/mod.rs Outdated
tcx.visit_all_bodies_in_krate(|body_owner_def_id, _body_id| {
tcx.item_tables(body_owner_def_id);
});
ty::queries::typeck_item_bodies::get(tcx, DUMMY_SP, LOCAL_CRATE)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does the separate DepNode::TypeckBodiesKrate task even need to exist?

Copy link
Member Author

@cramertj cramertj Mar 21, 2017 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For the moment, yes, because otherwise it causes and ICE with "read/write of Some(TypeckBodiesKrate) but no current task".

Should I try and fix this here somehow or just add a FIXME?

cc @nikomatsakis

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think a FIXME is a good idea.

@nikomatsakis nikomatsakis mentioned this pull request Mar 22, 2017
Closed
63 tasks
@cramertj
Copy link
Member Author

@nikomatsakis Added the FIXME. Anything else I should do to this?

@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 23, 2017

📌 Commit 8c92044 has been approved by nikomatsakis

alexcrichton added a commit to alexcrichton/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2017
@alexcrichton
Rollup merge of rust-lang#40540 - cramertj:check-bodies-as-query, r=n…
593b535 
…ikomatsakis

On-demandify the typechecking of item bodies

r? @nikomatsakis
@alexcrichton alexcrichton mentioned this pull request Mar 25, 2017
Closed
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2017
@bors
Auto merge of #40810 - alexcrichton:rollup, r=alexcrichton
40ae49a 
Rollup of 11 pull requests

- Successful merges: #40347, #40501, #40516, #40524, #40540, #40642, #40683, #40764, #40778, #40807, #40809
- Failed merges: #40771
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2017
@bors
Auto merge of #40810 - alexcrichton:rollup, r=alexcrichton
ed9108d 
Rollup of 11 pull requests

- Successful merges: #40347, #40501, #40516, #40524, #40540, #40642, #40683, #40764, #40778, #40807, #40809
- Failed merges: #40771
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 25, 2017

🔒 Merge conflict

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 26, 2017

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #40826) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 27, 2017

📌 Commit 61cd190 has been approved by nikomatsakis

@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 27, 2017

📌 Commit 8a27a51 has been approved by nikomatsakis

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 29, 2017

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #40867) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@frewsxcv frewsxcv mentioned this pull request Mar 29, 2017
Closed
@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 29, 2017

📌 Commit 3b10b4e has been approved by nikomatsakis

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 29, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 3b10b4e with merge cf69238...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 29, 2017
@bors
Auto merge of #40540 - cramertj:check-bodies-as-query, r=nikomatsakis
cf69238 
On-demandify the typechecking of item bodies

r? @nikomatsakis
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 29, 2017

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: nikomatsakis
Pushing cf69238 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 3b10b4e into rust-lang:master Mar 29, 2017
This was referenced Mar 29, 2017
Merged
Merged
@cramertj cramertj deleted the check-bodies-as-query branch September 21, 2017 16:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@eddyb eddyb eddyb left review comments

@nikomatsakis nikomatsakis nikomatsakis approved these changes

Assignees

@nikomatsakis nikomatsakis

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@cramertj @nikomatsakis @bors @eddyb