Skip to content

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

It was discovered #40264 that this backtrace pruning logic is a little too
aggressive, so while we figure how out to handle #40264 this commit backs out
the changes on beta to prune frames. Note that other cosmetic changes, such as
better path printing and such remain.

It was discovered rust-lang#40264 that this backtrace pruning logic is a little too
aggressive, so while we figure how out to handle rust-lang#40264 this commit backs out
the changes on beta to prune frames. Note that other cosmetic changes, such as
better path printing and such remain.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @brson

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

warning Warning warning

  • Pull requests are usually filed against the master branch for this repo, but this one is against beta. Please double check that you specified the right target!

@alexcrichton alexcrichton added the T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Mar 20, 2017
@alexcrichton alexcrichton mentioned this pull request Mar 21, 2017
5 tasks
@brson
Copy link
Contributor

brson commented Mar 23, 2017

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 23, 2017

📌 Commit 810fd29 has been approved by brson

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 25, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 810fd29 with merge 8cf8338...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 25, 2017

💔 Test failed - status-travis

@arielb1
Copy link
Contributor

arielb1 commented Mar 25, 2017

arielb1 and others added 2 commits March 27, 2017 06:53
The emsdk-portable .tar.gz now extracts to emsdk-portable instead of
emsdk_portable. Handle that.
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: r=brson

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 27, 2017

📌 Commit 7573111 has been approved by brson

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 27, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 7573111 with merge 646873b...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2017
[beta] std: Back out backtrace pruning logic on beta

It was discovered #40264 that this backtrace pruning logic is a little too
aggressive, so while we figure how out to handle #40264 this commit backs out
the changes on beta to prune frames. Note that other cosmetic changes, such as
better path printing and such remain.
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 27, 2017

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: brson
Pushing 646873b to beta...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants