Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Only use cargo-vendor if building from git sources #41047

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 7, 2017

Conversation

cuviper
Copy link
Member

@cuviper cuviper commented Apr 3, 2017

The only time we need to vendor sources is when building from git. If one is
building from a rustc source tarball, everything should already be in place.
This also matters for distros which do offline builds, as they can't install
cargo-vendor this way.

This adds a common Build::src_is_git flag, and then uses it in the dist-src
target to decide whether to install or use cargo-vendor at all.

Fixes #41042.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @brson

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@cuviper
Copy link
Member Author

cuviper commented Apr 3, 2017

r? @alexcrichton

I'd also nominate this for beta as it's a slight regression from 1.16, which didn't try to access the network.

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned alexcrichton and unassigned brson Apr 3, 2017
@@ -233,6 +234,7 @@ impl Build {
};
let rust_info = channel::GitInfo::new(&src);
let cargo_info = channel::GitInfo::new(&src.join("cargo"));
let src_is_git = src.join(".git").is_dir();
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This won't work if rust itself is a git submodule. Checking if .git exists at all would be an improvement.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm, I thought it was better to be more precise, but I see your point. I'll check just for existence.

Copy link
Member

@aidanhs aidanhs Apr 3, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(i.e. using fs::metadata as before) edit: oops, didn't see your comment

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Or Path::exists() is the same metadata check, but shorter. :)

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+

Thanks @cuviper!

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 3, 2017

📌 Commit 4d32ff4 has been approved by alexcrichton

let mut has_cargo_vendor = false;
let mut cmd = Command::new(&build.cargo);
for line in output(cmd.arg("install").arg("--list")).lines() {
has_cargo_vendor |= line.starts_with("cargo-vendor ");
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

doesn't this allow the build to use an installed cargo-vendor of the wrong version?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe so, but FWIW I didn't really change any of these lines, only their indentation.

@arielb1
Copy link
Contributor

arielb1 commented Apr 4, 2017

beta-nominate this?

@alexcrichton alexcrichton added beta-accepted Accepted for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. beta-nominated Nominated for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. labels Apr 4, 2017
@cuviper
Copy link
Member Author

cuviper commented Apr 4, 2017

Should I open a beta backport PR? It seems like you're rolling these in batches lately.
(It's an easy backport -- the diff applies cleanly as-is.)

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@cuviper yeah if you're willing please feel free! We'll batch up if necessary but it's not required.

@cuviper
Copy link
Member Author

cuviper commented Apr 4, 2017

#41069 is for beta.

@alexcrichton alexcrichton removed the beta-nominated Nominated for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. label Apr 4, 2017
frewsxcv added a commit to frewsxcv/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2017
Only use cargo-vendor if building from git sources

The only time we need to vendor sources is when building from git.  If one is
building from a rustc source tarball, everything should already be in place.
This also matters for distros which do offline builds, as they can't install
cargo-vendor this way.

This adds a common `Build::src_is_git` flag, and then uses it in the dist-src
target to decide whether to install or use `cargo-vendor` at all.

Fixes rust-lang#41042.
frewsxcv added a commit to frewsxcv/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2017
Only use cargo-vendor if building from git sources

The only time we need to vendor sources is when building from git.  If one is
building from a rustc source tarball, everything should already be in place.
This also matters for distros which do offline builds, as they can't install
cargo-vendor this way.

This adds a common `Build::src_is_git` flag, and then uses it in the dist-src
target to decide whether to install or use `cargo-vendor` at all.

Fixes rust-lang#41042.
frewsxcv added a commit to frewsxcv/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2017
Only use cargo-vendor if building from git sources

The only time we need to vendor sources is when building from git.  If one is
building from a rustc source tarball, everything should already be in place.
This also matters for distros which do offline builds, as they can't install
cargo-vendor this way.

This adds a common `Build::src_is_git` flag, and then uses it in the dist-src
target to decide whether to install or use `cargo-vendor` at all.

Fixes rust-lang#41042.
frewsxcv added a commit to frewsxcv/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2017
Only use cargo-vendor if building from git sources

The only time we need to vendor sources is when building from git.  If one is
building from a rustc source tarball, everything should already be in place.
This also matters for distros which do offline builds, as they can't install
cargo-vendor this way.

This adds a common `Build::src_is_git` flag, and then uses it in the dist-src
target to decide whether to install or use `cargo-vendor` at all.

Fixes rust-lang#41042.
frewsxcv added a commit to frewsxcv/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2017
Only use cargo-vendor if building from git sources

The only time we need to vendor sources is when building from git.  If one is
building from a rustc source tarball, everything should already be in place.
This also matters for distros which do offline builds, as they can't install
cargo-vendor this way.

This adds a common `Build::src_is_git` flag, and then uses it in the dist-src
target to decide whether to install or use `cargo-vendor` at all.

Fixes rust-lang#41042.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2017
Rollup of 9 pull requests

- Successful merges: #40797, #41047, #41056, #41061, #41075, #41080, #41120, #41130, #41131
- Failed merges:
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 7, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 4d32ff4 with merge 53f4bc3...

@bors bors merged commit 4d32ff4 into rust-lang:master Apr 7, 2017
@cuviper cuviper deleted the src_is_git branch September 26, 2017 06:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
beta-accepted Accepted for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants