-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[beta] Rollup of 2 pull requests #41051
Conversation
frewsxcv
commented
Apr 3, 2017
- Successful merges: [beta] Beta next #41016, [beta] Backport #41045: switch to vault.centos.org #41048
- Failed merges:
When the Range expression is the root of a constant, its node-id is used for the def-id of the body, so it has to be preserved in the AST -> HIR lowering. Fixes rust-lang#40749.
LLVM has a bug - PR32488 - where it fails to deduplicate allocas in some circumstances. The function `start_new_block` has allocas totalling 1216 bytes, and when LLVM inlines several copies of that function into the recursive function `expr::into`, that function's stack space usage goes into tens of kiBs, causing stack overflows. Mark `start_new_block` as inline(never) to keep it from being inlined, getting stack usage under control. Fixes rust-lang#40493. Fixes rust-lang#40573.
Looks like the last version was built with mio 0.6.5 which now has known bugs against it. This build includes mio 0.6.6
[beta] Beta next - rust-lang#40764 - rust-lang#40809 - rust-lang#41015 r? @brson
…chton [beta] Backport rust-lang#41045: switch to vault.centos.org r? @alexcrichton
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @nrc (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
@bors r+ p=15 |
📌 Commit 68fcad8 has been approved by |
⌛ Testing commit 68fcad8 with merge 66d192e... |
💔 Test failed - status-appveyor |
… On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 6:36 PM, bors ***@***.***> wrote:
💔 Test failed - status-appveyor
<https://ci.appveyor.com/project/rust-lang/rust/build/1.0.2722>
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#41051 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAD95KfUhXwNXuk8bQJyI11I9F6eol0vks5rsZCXgaJpZM4MyN_C>
.
|
⌛ Testing commit 68fcad8 with merge 368d709... |
💔 Test failed - status-travis |
@bors retry |
⌛ Testing commit 68fcad8 with merge f5a87a6... |
💔 Test failed - status-travis |
@bors retry |
⌛ Testing commit 68fcad8 with merge ebbe365... |
⌛ Testing commit 68fcad8 with merge fced6c1... |
@bors retry |
⌛ Testing commit 68fcad8 with merge 44bf84f... |
@bors retry |
⌛ Testing commit 68fcad8 with merge dcee285... |
@bors retry |
⌛ Testing commit 68fcad8 with merge 0973bd0... |
@bors retry |
☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis |