Skip to content

fix typo in Unique::empty doc #41886

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 10, 2017
Merged

Conversation

RalfJung
Copy link
Member

Subject says it all

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @sfackler (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@RalfJung RalfJung changed the title fix typo in Unique::new doc fix typo in Unique::empty doc May 10, 2017
@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+ rollup

thank you!

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 10, 2017

📌 Commit ec141c8 has been approved by steveklabnik

steveklabnik added a commit to steveklabnik/rust that referenced this pull request May 10, 2017
…abnik

fix typo in Unique::empty doc

Subject says it all
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request May 10, 2017
Rollup of 5 pull requests

- Successful merges: #41531, #41536, #41809, #41854, #41886
- Failed merges:
@bors bors merged commit ec141c8 into rust-lang:master May 10, 2017
@RalfJung RalfJung deleted the unique-doc-typo branch July 15, 2017 18:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants