Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

windows::fs::symlink_dir: fix example to actually use symlink_dir #43222

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 15, 2017

Conversation

RalfJung
Copy link
Member

I don't have a windows machine, so I couldn't test if this doctest still works -- but it looks trivial enough. (I know, famous last words.)

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @sfackler

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@sfackler
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 13, 2017

📌 Commit 03f22fd has been approved by sfackler

@shepmaster shepmaster added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Jul 14, 2017
frewsxcv added a commit to frewsxcv/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2017
windows::fs::symlink_dir: fix example to actually use symlink_dir

I don't have a windows machine, so I couldn't test if this doctest still works -- but it looks trivial enough. (I know, famous last words.)
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2017
Rollup of 8 pull requests

- Successful merges: #43074, #43145, #43159, #43202, #43222, #43228, #43229, #43240
- Failed merges:
@bors bors merged commit 03f22fd into rust-lang:master Jul 15, 2017
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 15, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 03f22fd with merge a783fe2...

@RalfJung RalfJung deleted the symlink branch July 15, 2017 17:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants