-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The Magenta kernel is now called Zircon. #44612
Conversation
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @dtolnay (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
Hi there! I hope I caught all the instances, but haven't been able to run tests yet. Any guidance on how to produce appropriate test coverage would be much appreciated. |
You can set Line 98 in fd4bef5
To let you test this on travis before r+ |
Tier 2 platform + senior Google employee working on platform + everything in this PR only affects that platform = do what you want, I guess. 😜 r=me after removing ALLOW_PR=1. |
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #44634) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
b66611b
to
e9d7c04
Compare
Rebased, but it looks like I picked up some submodules changes. Not sure what to make of these. |
I think I fixed the submodules issue. |
@dtolnay, could you approve this change? I removed the Travis testing bit and rebased. |
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit 9f0cd9e has been approved by |
Thanks for the approval @dtolnay. What's the next step, will the bot check the change in? Sorry for pressing, but this is blocking some of our work over in Fuchsialand. |
Yep, the bot will merge as soon as the build passes against the merge commit. That ensures the master branch is always a commit that has passed all CI (the "not rocket science" approach to CI). I'm not really familiar with this UI but here is the current queue: https://buildbot2.rust-lang.org/homu/queue/rust |
⌛ Testing commit 9f0cd9ea03f26d98c452694a6c04a8c6b6587581 with merge 62b24094ffa0320bedd21ab33f9d0bb5da853b20... |
💔 Test failed - status-travis |
The
|
@petrhosek see error above. |
Does this need another approval or will the bot pick it up again? |
Yes it needs another approval. r? @dtolnay |
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit 23ef8fd has been approved by |
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit fbcb0a5 has been approved by |
fbcb0a5
to
88d689a
Compare
@dtolnay thanks for plugging away with us. I just pushed a rebase and and update of liblibc, which should fix the linker failure. When I tested this locally, it looks like liblibc 0.2.31 has dependencies on other submodules that would need to be updated, but I'm not sure which ones. Would appreciate seeing if it builds in the bots, as my local build may be different. |
This toolchain is already used to build Zircon itself and is the official Clang toolchain used by all Fuchsia developers.
This appears to be needed by the Rust build.
77475ef
to
c481f85
Compare
Rebased and fixed up, I think those changes might even fix our build issue. Ever hopeful. |
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit c481f85 has been approved by |
If you need to push any more changes and the new changes only affect the fuchsia target, leave a comment |
💡 This pull request was already approved, no need to approve it again.
|
📌 Commit c481f85 has been approved by `dtolnay`` |
⌛ Testing commit c481f85 with merge b2968acc726d5d33ab4ad4a768d16bfd7eee94a4... |
💔 Test failed - status-travis |
* Adjust bootstrap to provide useful output on failure * Add missing package dependencies in the build environment * Fix permission bits on prebuilt toolchain files
@bors r=dtolnay |
@raggi: 🔑 Insufficient privileges: Not in reviewers |
Oh I didn't know about that. I will try to find out whether there is a way to delegate review permission. @bors r+ |
📌 Commit a3aef1a has been approved by |
@bors: r+ |
💡 This pull request was already approved, no need to approve it again.
|
📌 Commit a3aef1a has been approved by |
@bors: delegate=raggi |
✌️ @raggi can now approve this pull request |
The Magenta kernel is now called Zircon.
☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis |
Thanks again folks for all your patience and assistance. |
No description provided.