Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Explain unusual debugging code in librustc #48124

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 10, 2018

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

Introduced in #47828 to help track down some bugs, it landed a bit hastily so
this is intended on cleaning it up a bit.

Introduced in rust-lang#47828 to help track down some bugs, it landed a bit hastily so
this is intended on cleaning it up a bit.
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

r? @kennytm

cc @eddyb

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @michaelwoerister

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@kennytm
Copy link
Member

kennytm commented Feb 10, 2018

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 10, 2018

📌 Commit 3a96767 has been approved by kennytm

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Feb 10, 2018
kennytm added a commit to kennytm/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2018
…kennytm

Explain unusual debugging code in librustc

Introduced in rust-lang#47828 to help track down some bugs, it landed a bit hastily so
this is intended on cleaning it up a bit.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2018
@bors bors merged commit 3a96767 into rust-lang:master Feb 10, 2018
@alexcrichton alexcrichton deleted the clean-up-debugging branch February 26, 2018 23:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants