-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: Forcibly remove MAKEFLAGS in compiletest #48938
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
When executing run-make tests we run a risk of leaking the `MAKEFLAGS` environment variable if `./x.py` itself was called from `make` (aka `make check -j3` as the OSX bots do). We may then leak accidentally fds into the child process and trick it into thinking it's got a jobserver! Hopefully addresses [this] spurious failure [this]: rust-lang#48295 (comment)
r? @kennytm |
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit 9a3128e has been approved by |
Mark-Simulacrum
added a commit
to Mark-Simulacrum/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 12, 2018
…ennytm test: Forcibly remove MAKEFLAGS in compiletest When executing run-make tests we run a risk of leaking the `MAKEFLAGS` environment variable if `./x.py` itself was called from `make` (aka `make check -j3` as the OSX bots do). We may then leak accidentally fds into the child process and trick it into thinking it's got a jobserver! Hopefully addresses [this] spurious failure [this]: rust-lang#48295 (comment)
@bors: p=1 I think this may have happened again |
This was referenced Mar 12, 2018
Merged
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 12, 2018
test: Forcibly remove MAKEFLAGS in compiletest When executing run-make tests we run a risk of leaking the `MAKEFLAGS` environment variable if `./x.py` itself was called from `make` (aka `make check -j3` as the OSX bots do). We may then leak accidentally fds into the child process and trick it into thinking it's got a jobserver! Hopefully addresses [this] spurious failure [this]: #48295 (comment)
☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis |
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When executing run-make tests we run a risk of leaking the
MAKEFLAGS
environment variable if
./x.py
itself was called frommake
(akamake check -j3
as the OSX bots do). We may then leak accidentally fds into the childprocess and trick it into thinking it's got a jobserver!
Hopefully addresses this spurious failure