-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Clarify AcqRel's docs #49170
Clarify AcqRel's docs #49170
Conversation
This implied things that are not true. Fixes rust-lang#49127
Highfive failed to assign an reviewer, picking someone randomly from the docs team. r? @frewsxcv |
@pietroalbini: 🔑 Insufficient privileges: Not in reviewers |
@bors r+ rollup |
📌 Commit deae8de has been approved by |
Well, lets see. The new wording seems as ambiguous to me. One can interpret the new wording as being equivalent to Can we just note that this ordering is only applicable for operations that combine both loads and stores and for loads it then uses acquire ordering and for stores it would use the release ordering? |
r? @nagisa |
@bors r+ rollup |
📌 Commit 23013c7 has been approved by |
Clarify AcqRel's docs This implied things that are not true. Fixes rust-lang#49127
Clarify AcqRel's docs This implied things that are not true. Fixes rust-lang#49127
This implied things that are not true.
Fixes #49127