Skip to content

[doc] note the special type inference handling for shift ops #49915

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 14, 2018
+12 −2
Merged

[doc] note the special type inference handling for shift ops #49915

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
14 changes: 12 additions & 2 deletions src/libcore/ops/bit.rs
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -315,7 +315,12 @@ macro_rules! bitxor_impl {

bitxor_impl! { bool usize u8 u16 u32 u64 u128 isize i8 i16 i32 i64 i128 }

/// The left shift operator `<<`.
/// The left shift operator `<<`. Note that because this trait is implemented
/// for all integer types with multiple right-hand-side types, Rust's type
/// checker has special handling for `_ << _`, setting the result type for
/// integer operations to the type of the left-hand-side operand. This means
/// that though `a << b` and `a.shl(b)` are one and the same from an evaluation
/// standpoint, they are different when it comes to type inference.
///
/// # Examples
///
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -417,7 +422,12 @@ macro_rules! shl_impl_all {

shl_impl_all! { u8 u16 u32 u64 u128 usize i8 i16 i32 i64 isize i128 }

/// The right shift operator `>>`.
/// The right shift operator `>>`. Note that because this trait is implemented
/// for all integer types with multiple right-hand-side types, Rust's type
/// checker has special handling for `_ >> _`, setting the result type for
/// integer operations to the type of the left-hand-side operand. This means
/// that though `a >> b` and `a.shr(b)` are one and the same from an evaluation
/// standpoint, they are different when it comes to type inference.
///
/// # Examples
///
Expand Down