three diagnostics upgrades #51750
Merged
three diagnostics upgrades #51750
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
zackmdavis
force-pushed
the
superstructure
branch
from
fcdf08d to
1658449
Compare
oli-obk
reviewed
Jun 24, 2018
src/librustc_typeck/check/cast.rs
Outdated
| "type ascription or " | ||
| } else { | ||
| "" | ||
| }; | ||
| if t_cast.is_numeric() && t_expr.is_numeric() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The only difference between the two branches is the lint ID and the word numeric, can you pull those out into variables and only make a single error emitting call?
Now that `..=` inclusive ranges are stabilized, people probably shouldn't be using `...` even in patterns, even if it's still legal there (see rust-lang#51043). To avoid drawing attention to `...` being a real thing, let's reword this message to just say "unexpected token" rather "cannot be used in expressions".
The top level message shouldn't be too long; the replaced-by-coercion/temporary-variable advice can live in a note. Also, don't mention type ascription when it's not actually available as a real thing. (The current state of discussion on the type ascription tracking issue rust-lang#23416 makes one rather suspect it will never be a stable thing in its current form, but that's not for us to adjudicate in this commit.) While we're here, yank out the differentiating parts of the numeric/other conditional and only have one codepath emitting the diagnostic.
zackmdavis
force-pushed
the
superstructure
branch
from
1658449 to
0b39a82
Compare
|
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
|
@bors roll to disbelieve |
|
@bors r+ |
|
📌 Commit 0b39a82 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 25, 2018
three diagnostics upgrades * reword `...` expression syntax error to not imply that you should use it in patterns either (#51043) and make it a structured suggestion * shorten the top-line message for the trivial-casts lint by tucking the advisory sentence into a help note * structured suggestion for pattern-named-the-same-as-variant warning r? @oli-obk
|
☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
...expression syntax error to not imply that you should use it in patterns either (rewrite...to..=as an idiom lint for Rust 2018 edition #51043) and make it a structured suggestionr? @oli-obk